Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Should we roll the dice on....


RumHam
 Share

Recommended Posts

One guy I wouldn't mind us taking a flyer on for a late round pick is Aidan O'Connell from the Raiders.

I got to watch him play a lot his rookie year since my dad is a Raiders fan and I think he's got starter potential.

If nothing else he can be a solid backup/bridge QB until we draft a QB in a couple years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jay Roosevelt said:

One guy I wouldn't mind us taking a flyer on for a late round pick is Aidan O'Connell from the Raiders.

I got to watch him play a lot his rookie year since my dad is a Raiders fan and I think he's got starter potential.

If nothing else he can be a solid backup/bridge QB until we draft a QB in a couple years.

He looks like he's one smart comment away from snatching up some poor BOA vendor by the collar and demanding a liter 'a cola.

2606.png.ea81794535dd852f4c42410a9052557b.png

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jay Roosevelt said:

One guy I wouldn't mind us taking a flyer on for a late round pick is Aidan O'Connell from the Raiders.

I got to watch him play a lot his rookie year since my dad is a Raiders fan and I think he's got starter potential.

If nothing else he can be a solid backup/bridge QB until we draft a QB in a couple years.

If any backup qb out there had any potential to be a starter they would be a starter already. A backup is a backup for a reason.  They are the last resort when the starter goes down. When the starter goes down for more then a few games their teams season is over. Looking for someone's backup as a future starter is a waste a time and energy. Also teams do not develop qbs outside of their starter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jon Snow said:

If any backup qb out there had any potential to be a starter they would be a starter already. A backup is a backup for a reason.  They are the last resort when the starter goes down. When the starter goes down for more then a few games their teams season is over. Looking for someone's backup as a future starter is a waste a time and energy. Also teams do not develop qbs outside of their starter. 

Well obviously we'd need to draft our guy long-term, but this upcoming QB class isn't looking very good so it's likely going to be at least 2027 before we draft a QB early again.

It's either try to find a decent bridge QB or stick it out with Bryce. I don't know of any other options.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Jay Roosevelt said:

Well obviously we'd need to draft our guy long-term, but this upcoming QB class isn't looking very good so it's likely going to be at least 2027 before we draft a QB early again.

It's either try to find a decent bridge QB or stick it out with Bryce. I don't know of any other options.

They will stick it out with who they have now this season. They have no other choice. Next year this group may not be here to select the next group of qb's to battle with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jon Snow said:

They will stick it out with who they have now this season. They have no other choice. Next year this group may not be here to select the next group of qb's to battle with.

Maybe, but we're still left with the same choices regardless of who is making them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

If any backup qb out there had any potential to be a starter they would be a starter already. A backup is a backup for a reason.  They are the last resort when the starter goes down. When the starter goes down for more then a few games their teams season is over. Looking for someone's backup as a future starter is a waste a time and energy. Also teams do not develop qbs outside of their starter. 

I'm glad we didn't take that approach going into '03.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jay Roosevelt said:

Maybe, but we're still left with the same choices regardless of who is making them.

I'm not out on this qb class as others are. There's at least 3 guys who have a shot in the nfl. It doesn't mean I see them as a sure thing but this class is better than the Pickett draft class. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

I'm not out on this qb class as others are. There's at least 3 guys who have a shot in the nfl. It doesn't mean I see them as a sure thing but this class is better than the Pickett draft class. 

True but that's not saying much.

I haven't seen anyone who jumps off the screen at QB.

Mendoza has his moments but rarely has to beyond his first read.

Sellers is a physical freak, but hasn't played like it.

Nussmeier looks good against college defenses but doesn't exactly tick all the physical boxes himself. A taller Bryce Young?

Dante Moore looks like a good college QB surrounded by a lot of talent who will be overwhelmed in the pros.

Drew Allar... very similar to Sellers. Has the physical tools but doesn't always play like it.

Carson Beck is erratic as hell, even if he also has many of the traits you look for.

If I HAD to use a 1st round pick on one of those guys it's going to be Sellers just based off physical traits but he's not remotely ready to start as a rookie and I'm fairly convinced he's going to end up returning to school, though not necessarily South Carolina.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Jay Roosevelt said:

True but that's not saying much.

I haven't seen anyone who jumps off the screen at QB.

Mendoza has his moments but rarely has to beyond his first read.

Sellers is a physical freak, but hasn't played like it.

Nussmeier looks good against college defenses but doesn't exactly tick all the physical boxes himself. A taller Bryce Young?

Dante Moore looks like a good college QB surrounded by a lot of talent who will be overwhelmed in the pros.

Drew Allar... very similar to Sellers. Has the physical tools but doesn't always play like it.

Carson Beck is erratic as hell, even if he also has many of the traits you look for.

If I HAD to use a 1st round pick on one of those guys it's going to be Sellers just based off physical traits but he's not remotely ready to start as a rookie and I'm fairly convinced he's going to end up returning to school, though not necessarily South Carolina.

I don't view physical traits as the number one thing to start with. How they play against the best competition in college weighs more than anything. Then you look at the physical attributes that will help them succeed at the next level. Thats where Young should have been removed from our board.

Its like reading applications before you decide who to interview. If the basic qualifications (great production against tough competition) are met then you weed out those that do meet other criteria (height, weight, arm strength) for success going forward. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jon Snow said:

I don't view physical traits as the number one thing to start with. How they play against the best competition in college weighs more than anything. Then you look at the physical attributes that will help them succeed at the next level. Thats where Young should have been removed from our board.

Its like reading applications before you decide who to interview. If the basic qualifications (great production against tough competition) are met then you weed out those that do meet other criteria (height, weight, arm strength) for success going forward. 

And again, which current QB prospects really fit that criteria? I'd love for there to be a QB worth taking, but I'm just not seeing it right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just draft a QB next year that actually has real physical traits and an NFL arm and keep it pushing. This season is a wash all we're going for now is whatever level of development we can gain which probably won't be much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Especially if you're wearing corduroys.  
    • I think about the only thing you can do is when they go empty in some of his heavy WR sets.....trot him out there for those looks and run a crosser for him and give him a shot if he has room to run.   I mean if we are attempting to set him up for success. Dude is just so small and inexperienced.  You can't have scenarios where he could be forced into run blocking and he most definitely isn't ready for life on the outside.   I was hoping we could phase him in w/ Renfrow late this year but it doesn't look like Canales can adapt his O to that type of slot WR (and Bryce does struggle w/ throws to small guys it appears).  I think odds are Jimmy would deal w/ a bad ball worse than Renfrow, just in terms of personal safety. 
    • And even in baseball they already went full circle.  Everybody figured out analytics was the way to go, and now everybody's making decisions the same way.  So now what differentiates you as a team if you're just crunching the numbers like everyone else?  Oh yeah like actual knowledge of the sport and experience with what works and what doesn't.  So ultimately it's circled right back to old guys sitting in a room talking about who's got a hotter girlfriend.
×
×
  • Create New...