Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who to pull for tonight?


SmittysLawnGuy
 Share

Recommended Posts

I don't see a scenario where we win enough games to get a wildcard spot but not enough to win the division so I view any team's games besides our and the Bucs to be irrelevant. Sure there's some statistical longshots but I'm not gonna worry about any of those. If it happens and we get in via wildcard I'll take it, but just gotta focus on winning the rest of our division games. Seahawks game would be nice too for some cushion if the Bucs drop one then we could split our series.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

I haven't even looked at playoff scenarios.

It's been so long since they had any significance for us, I forgot the existed 😕

I usually have nfl network on for the GMF show and they have the standing up every 1/2 hour. All we have to worry about is winning the division. The nfcs will not have a wildcard shot. Only the division winner is going.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

Can't see a wildcard coming out of the NFC South. Division champs or fishing. 

It would require too many team imploding for it to be a possibility. It would also require the Panthers to win more games than they have left. Its division champs or clean out your lockers when you get back from Tampa.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Can't see a wildcard coming out of the NFC South. Division champs or fishing. 

We close the season well but don't make the playoffs, then we don't see Bryce tested at that level.

That'll certainly make for some... interesting offseason discussion 😕

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

We close the season well but don't make the playoffs, then we don't see Bryce tested at that level.

That'll certainly make for some... interesting offseason discussion 😕

There will always be the Rams and 49ers games. I guess you could use the Seahawks and the Bucs since the would be playoff teams technically. So there's that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No you dont.  He had all those records for years before his final season. Whether career or season he had them all years before his final season in which he played 6 games.
    • Williams covered for Moore by saying they were on the wrong page about Moores specific route. Williams could have easily covered for him by saying he messed up. Suggesting only 1 route was ever intended to be a viable target is absurd.
    • I am going to agree with Linville this time--I think we need to get a veteran edge (We have Jones II, Scourton, and Princely--2 developmental guys and a decent veteran).  We don't really think of Jones because he had a hamstring injury weeks 3 and 4 and a back that required surgery Week 6-17.  He still managed 10 pressures, and he will be 28.  Princely Umanmielen only played in approximately 18-20% of the snaps and he struggled at times.  Basically, he was a situational pass rusher.  He got 1.5 sacks and 10 pressures.  He should improve, but for now, he is what he is.  Scourton gives us hope.  For a rookie (and thanks to Jones II's injuries, he was given more PT), he had 8 sacks--and held the edge.  He played at a first-round draft pick level.  He has the potential to become "that guy" in 2026. We lose Wonnum, who played nearly 700 snaps and amassed 3 whole sacks.  For a person raised a Gamecock, I would not be upset if we purged our roster of all South Carolina alumni.   However, I see it this way:  Wonnum was decent holding the edge, something Patrick Jones II and Scourton have demonstrated at a high level.  He is a liability, if you ask me.    Jones had 7 sacks one season in Minnesota and is known for his inside rushing ability--not what you would call a speed rusher.  I think Princely was a bit disappointing, but he was a bit raw.  Out of college, they described him as being a bit predictable.  I see no reason he will not improve in 2026 and become a situational pass rusher.   Basically, with Scourton and Princely expected to continue to develop and Jones II returning from injury, I think we need another veteran (if we can get a good one) to give us balance and depth.  A third developmental player is not ideal.   Draft:  OT, LB, WR, OL depth, S. Free Agency:  Edge, possibly a WR;  re-sign Mays, Cuhran, BC (??), and Nijman.  Let walk:  Wonnum, Scott, Dowdle.  I see about $20m per year after signing the OL depth.  Spend it on a veteran edge.   Players like Reddick (Tampa), Bosa (Buffalo), Khalil Mack (LAC) could be available on a one or two year deal in the $15m range.  We could splurge here, but I think a veteran situational pass rusher (depending on Jones II's back) is all we need while our 2 young guns develop.    
×
×
  • Create New...