Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tampa starting LG goes to IR.

UnluckyforSome

By UnluckyforSome,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

TLGPanthersFan Grand Master

TLGPanthersFan

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

Say what you want, those turnovers weren't flukes though. Great read by Jackson on the pick 6 and great individual plays by DB on the batted ball INT and strip sack. The Rams are good enough to consistently move that ball against the very best defenses, so of course they are going to be able to move the ball at will with over half of our defense being backups to the backups...

And our offense played a great game. The Packers game was definitely a GB shooting themselves in the foot type of loss for them. I don't think the Rams game was the same - we executed well on offense and came up with the timely turnovers we needed on defense.

Rams only punted once. Without those turnovers they would have scored on every drive. Our defense couldn’t stop anything and was getting sliced up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted
46 minutes ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

Rams only punted once. Without those turnovers they would have scored on every drive. Our defense couldn’t stop anything and was getting sliced up. 

Heres a key stat- Rams averaged 7.4 yards each play..... I REPEAT 7.4 YARDS EACH SNAP.

 

I forgot the posters name, but I said a long the lines defense didn't do much outside the TOs...Like watching the game- Rams run play 12 yards. Next play Rams pass for 29. Next play TE screen 7 yards. Just like watching a big college team vs DII team. Panthers on one TO was in the end zone and the fumble was in the red zone too. Rams did it to the cards too, I think the best job in the NFL is being the current rams punter. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Proudiddy Grand Master

Proudiddy

Posted
Posted
20 hours ago, CRA said:

Rams were theoretically licking their chops at our depleted defense last week.....and turned the ball over 3 times.  

I mean, it still a good thing.  Sometimes it takes a week or so for the weak links to really show what makes them so weak.  And sometimes, Derrick Brown is just there and any downgrade is hopefully a problem

I mean, I certainly hope we can exploit it and it plays to our advantage, but this is the NFL, and a division rival.  I still remember a few years back where the Saints lost all their active receivers going into our game.  They elevated two or three guys to start from the practice squad and proceeded to whoop our ass with ease and those PS guys out up numbers.  So, I like to see them banged up, but we definitely can’t mail it in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

I mean, I certainly hope we can exploit it and it plays to our advantage, but this is the NFL, and a division rival.  I still remember a few years back where the Saints lost all their active receivers going into our game.  They elevated two or three guys to start from the practice squad and proceeded to whoop our ass with ease and those PS guys out up numbers.  So, I like to see them banged up, but we definitely can’t mail it in.

newness of some of weaker players sometimes can work to your advantage for game.  Film and knowing what makes people what matters. 

We didn't pay the price some thought last week vs the Rams w/ an injured defense.  We often see QBs take advantage of being new.  Heck, even someone like Jimmy Horn, saw his best play his first 2 active games on the roster.  I do think film and time is what lets team feasts the most on backups. 

but Derrick Brown is Derrick Brown.  So, you got to think, film and knowing why someone is on the bench might not matter when you can get that ideal matchup.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • kungfoodude
      Go after Shedeur this offseason.

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      That's why I pointed it out because Bryce hasn't either, so it's not like that could be used an excuse for the poor winning percentage. And yes, right now, Kyler is the better QB. I would show it to you in the same "statistical" way that I did for Car123 but you have basically admitted that Kyler will obviously be statistically better(which is very true) and somehow that isn't relevant. Regardless, whether eye or statistical, you have made literally no reasonable counter argument other than "there is another guy in this forum that said he saw Arizona games and he said Kyler wasn't as good" and that "he got benched."  That's really been the bulk of your argument so far.  As for a "clutch performer", leader and whatever in the world a "smooth operator" is.....I guess that's the PFF version of your rankings. 
    • TN05
      First 4 NFL starts - Tyler Shough

      By TN05 · Posted

      The fact you're having to rely on "rushing yards per game" (he is averaging 18, Bryce is averaging 10) here is really telling lmao. I already gave the clear advanced differences. Shough is playing worse than Bryce. You are literally gassing up a worse, 2-4 QB for a rival team and I find that incredibly funny.
    • kungfoodude
      Go after Shedeur this offseason.

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      Okay so I took a look at this across a WIDE variety of overall metrics and statistical groups that should give an idea about overall play and some potential aggravating factors associated with their play.  Overall, I would say this indicates by the categories that I have detailed out that Tua and Geno are clearly the guys that are having worse seasons than Bryce. I would add that I am still of the opinion that they are better overall QB's given both capability and past performances. I will definitely concede there is not a solid statistical argument for them having a better year than Bryce, to date.  Here is the data I gathered and I have shaded the cells according to "better than" or "worse than" Bryce. In a couple of the categories, this is an inverse because I am indicating these were less aggravating situations than Bryce has had and therefore less excusable reasoning for sucking.  Let me know if there are any questions on the data/categories/etc.
×
×
  • Create New...