-
Welcome!
Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!
Or simply create a new Huddle account.
Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!
If you can only fire ONE person before 2026....
Who do you get rid of?
97 members have voted
-
-
-
-
Topics
-
-
-
-
Posts
-
I'm trying to get the random draw for Australia and whoever us plays match 3 but I think tickets to a lot of games are going to drop dramatically as world cup gets closer. Us games won't but a lot of the random ones will -
By raleigh-panther · Posted
@cranky Augmenting your offensive analysis Saints figured out panthers D Sad Just sad The panthers need a new DC. Many takeaways but here is the 2 biggest. One nickel routes, the coverage of the nickel back on offensive slot receiver tells offense that the out routes will be wide open. Ie. Get nickel back to sit and the other 2 DBs rarely challenge and are yards away leaving wr wide open The same concept on screen plays Two. continued positional issues in a defense that is run over and over -
I think if you look at Cam Newton’s rushing totals, there is an argument he should be in the HOF. I wrote a post many years ago comparing his TD total to those of great RBs of yesteryear’s past. Unfortunately I cannot find that post, and I don’t recall the specifics, but the takeaway was that players above a certain total rushing TD were all in the HOF. And those players were all RBs that I was comparing Cam to. At the time, Cam may not quite have been there yet, but if you projected forward, he was on pace to easily clear the hurdle. I have no idea if he ended up doing that since his career was cut short. That being said, even if he did make it to whatever that threshold was, I think he was too polarizing a player, with too short a peak, for voters to put him in the HOF.
-
-
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.