Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why does Bryce get the blame?


cranky
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, PantherChris said:

An offense that has 73% of the cap and the last five years of first rounders should be expected to score more than 17 points in a critical game vs the worst team in the NFC

If your expecting us to be like the Rams or Lions then your sadly mistaken. We will never be a high octane offense like that. We have always been a run first team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

Yep.  We have invested in this team significantly lopsided.  It should be an O heavy team at this stage even if not consistent.  But it’s an archaic O because of the QB. 

I mean the draft has been O- TMJ, mingo, XL, tmac all either 1st or 2nd rounders

rb- brooks in the 2nd, early 4th on trevor

TE- first 4th rounder sanders, Evans mid 5th

I mean after that "all-D rhule" draft its been O in the early and often cat. 

#1 cap/money OL in the NFL without icky signing his record breaking LT deal. 

BY only needs 10 all-pros around him, then WATCH-OUT NFL!!!!

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ncsfinest21 said:

If your expecting us to be like the Rams or Lions then your sadly mistaken. We will never be a high octane offense like that. We have always been a run first team.

You can be high octane with a run based offense see 2015 panthers, last years eagles, any of the last five years of Baltimore teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here’s what I dont understand.  We basically played the same game against New Orleans that lost us the first matchup. Why not let Bryce turn it loose. What an absolute perfect opportunity for the franchise to fully evaluate him in these final four games. 
 

if he absolutely falls on his face, you have your definitive answer and will have no issue selling it to your fanbase that you’re moving on.  You will have constructed a good core of offensive players that you should be able to plug a vet into and see similar if not better results. 
 

If he balls out, you’ll have all the evidence you need to speak about growth and giving the fifth year option won’t be as tough a pill to swallow. You’ll also be a playoff team in year two and be flirting with double digit wins. 
 

if it’s uneven, which it likely would be, you can talk about growth and being ahead of schedule with the roster and go into next year with some time on your hands before needing to make a decision on the fifth year. 
 

the absolute last thing you needed to do was put up another game where there’s more questions than answers about your QBs ability and the trust you have in him. 
 

Canales and his staff were horrendous yesterday. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, PantherChris said:

You can be high octane with a run based offense see 2015 panthers, last years eagles, any of the last five years of Baltimore teams.

well if he (bryce) was 6'5" 245 lbs than yea we could but he isnt which is why I wasnt a advocate for him in the first place. But as for yesterdays game he played well enough for us to win without the defense getting penalties all the time. And all the teams have scrambling QBs who are big.

Edited by ncsfinest21
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ncsfinest21 said:

well if he (bryce) was 6'5" 245 lbs than yea we could but he isnt which is why I wasnt a advocate for him in the first place. But as for yesterdays game he played well enough for us to win without the defense getting penalties all the time. And all the teams have scrambling QBs who are big.

If your #1 overall pick can't be counted on to will your team to a win vs an opponent who is 2-10 vs the rest of the NFL..... yeah 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, PantherChris said:

Thats more on Canales plenty of teams use the TE or RB for it

It’s slightly different.  Most of those teams aren’t doing it because their QBs are incapable….  so the message to everyone is a little different. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

okay so its Bryce fault they get a holding call and et backed up. Come on man. You know we arent good at 3rd and longs. He didnt turn the ball over and he dropped dimes to Coker and TMAC shouldve caught that one. Granted a little behind but very catchable.  Im not a Bryce supporter at all but I call it how I see it. He didnt cost us that game yesterday. Nuff said.

Edited by ncsfinest21
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It wasn't the play calling or the preparation. It was the execution and on field communication in the final 11 minutes of the game with over an 80% win probability.

It began on 3rd and short inside the opponents 40. Bryce audibled out to a QB run. TMac was set up for a one on one on the outside. Bryce identified the 6 gap property as the greatest chance of success, but failed to realize Chuba was confused on the audible leading to the blocking break down between Chuba and Tremble on Granderson. They were suppose to double Granderson and Tremble peels off to block the safety allowing  Bryce to choose to go to the inside or outside off the double team based on where the safety commits.

Chuba also messed up the 4th and 1 with poor vision and not trusting to go off the block of Ekwonu into a sealed running lane for an easy 1 yard gain. Why Chuba thought doing a lateral jump cut to the right side of the line when it was a dive to the left is puzzling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, CRA said:

His O is just built on taking repeated shots and that’s not BY’s game.  It was always a round peg and square hole….

But I also agree with your post.  I hate OC HCs.  Especially green ones.   I never liked anything about the setup.  He should have had a real OC.  Focused on learning to be a HC. 

I get your point but personally I’ll take an Andy Reid any day.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...