Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Some ALL-22 clips…


*FreeFua*
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, frankw said:

That being said. Some folks are very unnecessarily going into overdrive to spin a #1 pick who just happens to be the most undersized QB in the league (yes he is shorter than Kyler Murray let's just be real here) finishing with the lowest single game passing yardage per 24 attempts since all the way back to 1980.

Good Lord!

I bet the O-line play wasn't the worst since 1980. 

And @thebdawg, injuries absolutely can make for a bad showing at the end of the day. That's not an excuse, it's just a fact.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, thebdawg said:

There’s way too much invested in this line for it to perform this poorly, injuries or not 

Most teams OLs are dealing with injuries at the end of the season. So by that token all QB play should be horrific across the board, but it's not.  Using the OL as an excuse anytime a QB plays bad is just lazy.  This is the same OL when Bryce had his good games not so long ago.  So do they suck just when Bryce does bad? Obviously they played well enough when y'all were doing your victory laps and saying 'you told us Bryce was the man' in the victories.

It goes back to my stance with Bryce all along...he's a low end starting QB.  He'd be a great backup. Bryce is going to have a few really nice games a season at this point in his career, with a few WTF games mixed in, but very middling overall.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GoobyPls said:

I don’t think the average mouth breather on this forum understands how bad the pass protection is on this team. Even on check downs he’s getting blasted, that shouldn’t happen on check downs. 
 
Everyone knows QBs like Bryce needs passing lane, that’s his biggest fault. If the line is creating passing lanes this offense won’t function 

IMG_5107.jpeg.e7c67fc4d3d1b8c75dbf21687590bdd3.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Nice refute.

 

5 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

How is he wrong.  Enlighten us

So you two are mad because we didn’t beat a really good Seattle team and are now looking to place blame squarely on Bryce?

Brosmer throws for 51 yards and Minnesota wins and somehow that means we should’ve won?

Detroit had 6 turnovers. Addison a 65 yard rushing TD. Detroit scored 10 points. 

Some of you really struggle with big picture thinking ability when it comes to this stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

 

So you two are mad because we didn’t beat a really good Seattle team and are now looking to place blame squarely on Bryce?

Brosmer throws for 51 yards and Minnesota wins and somehow that means we should’ve won?

Detroit had 6 turnovers. Addison a 65 yard rushing TD. Detroit scored 10 points. 

Some of you really struggle with big picture thinking ability when it comes to this stuff.

This is what flailing looks like 

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Eazy-E said:

Defense stepped up after that and held them to a FG. Offense proceeded to turn it over on downs right after. 

Was it an incredibly dumb penalty, of course it was. The defense played their asses off though and got zero help from the offense. If you force them to punt at that point instead of the penalty do you really think the offense does anything differently?

We’ll never know for sure, but I’m reasonably certain just based on common sense that our offense functions completely differently with all the momentum and energy of the home crowd with 10 minutes left down one score, than they do with no momentum and a deflated crowd with only 5 minutes left and down 2 scores. The energy shift in the stadium and on the field after Horn’s penalty was beyond noticeable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

How is he wrong.  Enlighten us

Both of Bryce's sacks came within the final 5 minutes when the run game was clearly out the window.  The defense pinned their ears back, which defenses tend to do in obvious pass situations, especially at the end of the game.  So for 55 minutes Bryce was kept clean, but this is on the OL?  Could he have had more time? Sure. Good QBs can overcome a relentless pass rush.  So which is it? Is Bryce good enough to overcome constant pressure by a top-tier defense or does he need ample time...all the time, to be efficient?

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So Willis had a good game against a poor defense and all of a sudden he is worth 50 million and is guaranteed to be better than Young. LOL I know he looked good in the 3 games he started, and I think he will have success long term, but anyone signing him up for a long term contract for 50 million is taking a huge risk. 
    • Is he really though? Rivera was past his prime and probably shouldn't have even started 2019 so his firing wasn't really unexpected or unwarranted. Rhule lasted two and a half years which was about one year too long in my opinion. Bringing him back that third year certainly wasn't impulsive and I would say Tepper was more patient than he should have been. Wilks finished out that third season and did pretty good but most everyone could see he really wasn't anything more than an intern HC. Bringing him back was not the long term answer so not bringing him back was the correct call. Hiring Reich was a mistake from the beginning and he recognized that fairly quickly. I am sure he knew he was going to catch a lot of sh*t for firing him so quickly ( and boy did he ) but it was absolutely the right thing to do given everything that was going on. The firing may have looked impulsive, but I think it was him recognizing he had royally f*ck up and just dealt with it instead of letting it fester.  That brings us to Canales. 2025 was only his second season and yet he delivered 8 wins and the NFC South title. And while that might not sound great, given the lack of talent and cap space they started with, it's a strong step in the right direction. I couldn't imagine Tepper not being pleased with their progress given the crap the Panthers' have been though under his ownership.
×
×
  • Create New...