Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canes vs Ducks 7pm

Panthers Fan 69
 Share

Recommended Posts

DavidEng Grand Master

DavidEng

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, carpanfan96 said:

He had Hip Arthroscopy to take care of femoroacetabular impingement or FAI. 

I’m just glad it wasn’t  an issue with hydrocoptic marzul vanes or the ambaphascient lunar wainshaft side fumbling 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Stumpy Grand Master

Stumpy

Posted
Posted

Rod was asked in post-game to talk about Jalen Chatfields night...

"That was a bad break really [on the second goal against]. Happened the other night too where we dumped it and it hit our own guy and they go for a breakaway. Those are tough breaks, but it's tough to find fault in that game for anybody."

SMH... seriously, dude? Chatty put up a stat line of 1g, 1a, 3s, +2, 1hit and was a man possessed on defense for 21 minutes tonight, and you wanna focus on the one bad play in a 5-2 win?!? 

the killers singing GIF by UMC

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
PantherChris Grand Master

PantherChris

Posted
Posted
11 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

It is nice to see Freddie get the W. I hope he turns it around but.....I still think we should pursue moving him.

At this point we would probably have to move some low level assets to get a team to take him.... Rod needs to stop this 50/50 split bullshit vs a team that wasnt already on a 7 game slide last nights probably an L.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
12 hours ago, carpanfan96 said:

He had Hip Arthroscopy to take care of femoroacetabular impingement or FAI. 

That is potentially quite bad. TBH, that is something that may continue to be an issue his entire career depending on recovery.

Don't like that at all.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Panthers Fan 69 Grand Master

Panthers Fan 69

Posted
  • Author
Posted
46 minutes ago, PantherChris said:

I mean the way to do it was make sure we controlled the puck and they only got 13 shots Freddie was still rocking his .84 save %

I’ve been a critic of Freddie all year. But he played awesome last night.  Every shot he saw was a high danger.  All of them. From that first breakaway when we were on the PP to the very end. Those two goals weren’t on him whatsoever.  Miller was butt cheeks last night on both goals. Miller literally left his man in the offensive zone to get off the ice ….WIDE open in front of Freddie then lazyily skated back to freddie.  We were all yelling at miller to get back as it was happening then boom. Freddie was great.  

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
PantherChris Grand Master

PantherChris

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Panthers Fan 69 said:

I’ve been a critic of Freddie all year. But he played awesome last night.  Every shot he saw was a high danger.  All of them. From that first breakaway when we were on the PP to the very end. Those two goals weren’t on him whatsoever.  Miller was butt cheeks last night on both goals. Miller literally left his man in the offensive zone to get off the ice ….WIDE open in front of Freddie then lazyily skated back to freddie.  We were all yelling at miller to get back as it was happening then boom. Freddie was great.  

Both were medium danger chances bud. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Panthers Fan 69 Grand Master

Panthers Fan 69

Posted
  • Author
Posted
4 hours ago, PantherChris said:

Both were medium danger chances bud. 

Not a chance. Both were as high danger as it gets.  1st was a 3 on 0 where the ducks passed it three feet in from of Freddie. The other was a side door tap in. Doesn’t get more high danger.  Plus he helped kill off a 5 on 3 where most of the shots happened 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Joe Bear
      2026 World Cup Thread

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • TD alt
      LWOS on the FO's error--my word--on X...traits, timelines, Brazzell, & indications of improvement.

      By TD alt · Posted

      Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • rebelrouser
      LWOS on the FO's error--my word--on X...traits, timelines, Brazzell, & indications of improvement.

      By rebelrouser · Posted

      Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...