Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Should Canalas bring someone else in to call offensive plays?


Recommended Posts

 

MORGAN ON PLAY CALLER FOR CANALES

 

"I think that's really his [Canales'] call," he stated. "I think if he wants to promote somebody into being the play-caller or bring somebody from the outside. We haven't really talked about that. But that is something that I'm sure we'll talk about. We talk about every decision together. If he feels like he needs to add somebody or promote somebody into being the play-caller, then I trust him."

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jackson113.2 said:

 

MORGAN ON PLAY CALLER FOR CANALES

 

"I think that's really his [Canales'] call," he stated. "I think if he wants to promote somebody into being the play-caller or bring somebody from the outside. We haven't really talked about that. But that is something that I'm sure we'll talk about. We talk about every decision together. If he feels like he needs to add somebody or promote somebody into being the play-caller, then I trust him."

 

Translation:  Yeah he is going to make a change

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:


I'd like to believe that. I really would. But I don't see DC turning over control. 

He 2x in that short phrasing saying he had no problem bringing in someone from the outside.   I think its happening.  Morgan can make huge strides if he rearranges the qb room and gets a new play caller in here.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

He 2x in that short phrasing saying he had no problem bringing in someone from the outside.   I think its happening.  Morgan can make huge strides if he rearranges the qb room and gets a new play caller in here.

He also says he trusts Dave to make the right decision. We've seen it take weeks to recognize the simplest of things like giving the RB with the hot hand the ball. Something this big? Maybe year 5. 

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SmokinwithWilly said:

He also says he trusts Dave to make the right decision. We've seen it take weeks to recognize the simplest of things like giving the RB with the hot hand the ball. Something this big? Maybe year 5. 

I think that part was intentional as a wink wink nod nod.  Hes leaving it up to dave.  Riiiigggghhhttttt

 

At least thats what I am hoping we will see come march

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I think that part was intentional as a wink wink nod nod.  Hes leaving it up to dave.  Riiiigggghhhttttt

 

At least thats what I am hoping we will see come march

I hope so. This 5th year option has been a head scratcher to me so at this point nothing would surprise me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Translation:  Yeah he is going to make a change

My translator says something quite a bit different.

I think Canales stays as OC and it ends up getting him fired after the 2026 season.

Edited by kungfoodude
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Not if he wants to keep his job. He risks bringing in someone much better and exposes him for the fraud he is.

He installs his boy Brad.  Then he gets to “save the day when he sucks or claims he made Brad if he is decent. 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

IF canales were to give up play calling, it would most likely be internally with brad idzik who has no play calling experience whatsoever

now IF canales were to bring an outside candidate to call plays, would they be open to calling plays with canales' playbook? most likely, the outside candidate would like to bring in his own playbook, schemes, verbiage, and terminology. which means Bryce and the rest of the offense would have to somewhat learn a new system

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I can't help but think that you are equating physical attributes alone with wins. I don't subscribe to that thought. No one will argue that Young has a strong arm, but he makes up for it in other ways. The real limitation for him is he needs good route runners with great hands. That's why Young was so good at the end of the 24 season. Thielen and Coker were perfect receivers for him and he had his best games with them. Not having them to start the 25 season hurt. Look at the first 10 games in 25 with a rookie receiver and no Coker and then look at the final 7 games with a more experienced rookie and Coker back and there is a telling difference in Young's performance. Prior to week 10, Young had 1 game with a QB rating above 100, 2 games with a rating above 90 and 6 games with a rating below 90. In the last 7 games with Coker back, Young had 3 games with a QB rating above 100, 2 games with a rating above 90 and only 2 games with a rating below 90. The tools a QB has to work with matter more than their arm strength.  To go back to Darnold and Stafford, yes they both have great arm strength but neither had much success with that alone. As I already pointed out, Stafford, even with a canon for an arm, only had 4 winning seasons in his first 12 years. It was only when he went to the right environment that he had true success.
    • I don't love this role for him if I'm being totally honest The pregame show is much more flash than substance and doesn't seem like the right fit for what Luke would bring to the table, and that's his vision of the game. I'd like to see him do something where it more involves him breaking down film and explaining what he's seeing out there, as he sees the game in a way very few ever have.
×
×
  • Create New...