Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Divisional Round Playoffs Thread


Recommended Posts

I am just anti Seattle. I root for Sam, but that makes it tough. 
Out of the field, LAR had the best chance to go to Seattle and compete.  
On the short list of toughest places to play, they at least are used to it.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/47656592/cj-stroud-shoulders-blame-4-ints-texans-loss-pats

Quote

Stroud finished the postseason with two touchdowns to seven turnovers (five interceptions and two fumbles lost). He became the first player with that many turnovers in a single postseason since Carson Palmer had eight, also in only two games, in 2015. Stroud also became the first player with five interceptions and five fumbles in a single postseason.

Historically bad. Oof. I knew it had to be up there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, strato said:

I am just anti Seattle. I root for Sam, but that makes it tough. 
Out of the field, LAR had the best chance to go to Seattle and compete.  
On the short list of toughest places to play, they at least are used to it.  

I can deal with Seattle much easier than New England or Denver but they have some surprisingly smug fans.

That's why I would love St. Louis to win. I mean, they literally don't even have any fans at all. 2nd fewest in the NFL probably behind San Diego.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I can deal with Seattle much easier than New England or Denver but they have some surprisingly smug fans.

That's why I would love St. Louis to win. I mean, they literally don't even have any fans at all. 2nd fewest in the NFL probably behind San Diego.

Talking NFC.  I don’t know who I’d root for in the AFC. Would have to think. 
Sean Payton disqualifies Denver if SB 50 didn’t.  But I blame that SB on us. Pats, of course, are evil. But I like. Rebel lol. 

I guess Bills because of the ex Panthers and the inbreeding between them and the Panthers. 

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I can deal with Seattle much easier than New England or Denver but they have some surprisingly smug fans.

That's why I would love St. Louis to win. I mean, they literally don't even have any fans at all. 2nd fewest in the NFL probably behind San Diego.

St Louis? When did they get a team 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

Holding the best offense to 17 points in regulation and losing is a terrible look for Caleb and the offense 

Tough conditions to play in. I think there will be more optimism than dissatisfaction when those fans are discussing their team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

That's why I would love St. Louis to win. I mean, they literally don't even have any fans at all. 2nd fewest in the NFL probably behind San Diego.

I just had a panic attack, what year is this for real y’all?  I think I might have time travelled on accident and it’s haunting me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Listen I'm a die hard Panther and always will be but who are you rooting against when you say you don't want New England/Seattle? The only one that makes sense is the Broncos because of Payton. It has to be the fans you are cheering against because these are totally turned over rosters, not the dudes we hated back in the 2000-2010s. I fkn love watching Seattle play man, they remind me of the better years of the NFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really don't think Seattle wanted to see the Rams. They're the one team that can push them and that means Darnold will actually have to make plays. If not him being a ticking time bomb, that injury he has may be the determining factor. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am high, but that’s besides the point! The blue line is not good right now. I’ve said it all year. I don’t think this group meshes well. Slaven has been just OK Niki up and down Miller up and down ghost and Walker have been your most consistent guys. Maybe it comes together more towards the playoffs
    • I was expecting to see more cap room moves by now, which may be to suggest that we are not going to be that aggressive.  I have mixed emotions about that (because I think we have 3 needs on D and 3 needs on O--starters).  If you look to the draft for 3 starters, that is ambitious.  We need 6
    • Yeah we shouldn’t be competing with teams, bidding wise, to sign a WR. There will be one for us and our budget.  I keep saying, how many balls will there be to go around anyway? One thing good I will say for this offense is the ball has been spread around at times. Seems like I remember seeing a large number of guys have caught passes in a game. Or been targeted at least. 3 RBs 4 or 5 WRs 2-3 TEs type of stat lines. 10-11 guys.  Not every week but that happens.    As far as WR in general, we need the smaller agile and quicker component to compliment what is there. After that it should be about depth, having good backups for the starters so we can run things consistently still, if a guy is out for a week or two. That is especially important in game where you have to finish the game with who you made active. 
×
×
  • Create New...