Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

M Kaye on roster ahead of combine 3 positions not drafted by Morgan


Recommended Posts

On 2/27/2026 at 2:52 AM, Panthero said:

My draft would have us taking LB, OT, and C in the first three rounds. Probably in that order. 

Id kick out C for edge, but I get having C above. Who knows prince can be that guy, nic already showed he can handle starter reps. I think Jones is back, even if he can be cut. I know wonnom struggled, but I'd offer a near min deal with the hope he can be a backup. 

I think Corbett is back, cause he already said no matter what his wife wants to live there. there is also samac who they kept on the roster for nearly all season, he had to show something.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Basbear said:

Id kick out C for edge, but I get having C above. Who knows prince can be that guy, nic already showed he can handle starter reps. I think Jones is back, even if he can be cut. I know wonnom struggled, but I'd offer a near min deal with the hope he can be a backup. 

I think Corbett is back, cause he already said no matter what his wife wants to live there. there is also samac who they kept on the roster for nearly all season, he had to show something.

Longer term, I see DE being a smart play. Im trying to balance not reaching with guys that can also start pretty much out of the gate. I feel like grabbing another edge now just gives us another guy that needs time to cook like the two DEs we took last year. So its too much of the same at a single position. With C, you could arguably get a starter that is ready by mid-season. Just let Corbett start until then. Same thing id do with Yosh. Let him hold LT until a young guy is ready. Then see whats what with Icky/Moton the following year. 

 

As for the other DE moves, agree on all points. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/28/2026 at 12:20 AM, strato said:

That is a convoluted mess.
Cut to the end of all that and it comes down to we were picking 9th and wanted to pick 1st because we thought Bryce Young was worthy of that. 
 

I am not saying there weren’t fugups before with Burns and CMC and not taking a 1st for Moore and wherever else. Obviously there were some WTF happenings. And some were monumental in their own right.
But when the dust settled we were sitting there at 9 with what we came out of all that with and then we did what we did. 

The problem is it wasn’t convoluted. It was simple. If you know you are starting over in 2023 with a rookie QB, you plan your trades properly. We weren’t a good team and almost everyone could see that. You don’t try to go for it with a QB you plan to let go of and you build up assets instead of mortgaging the team on a physically limited QB.

Our biggest issue since Marty 2.0 is that we refuse to look ahead and plan an actual long term strategy. It’s killed us. If we played the 2022 trade season properly and traded away anyone who’d get us a pick, the 2025 Panthers would have had a team with multiple additional 1st round picks and other picks and we actually could have gone even further.

Nothing convoluted in that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, WhoKnows said:

The problem is it wasn’t convoluted. It was simple. If you know you are starting over in 2023 with a rookie QB, you plan your trades properly. We weren’t a good team and almost everyone could see that. You don’t try to go for it with a QB you plan to let go of and you build up assets instead of mortgaging the team on a physically limited QB.

Our biggest issue since Marty 2.0 is that we refuse to look ahead and plan an actual long term strategy. It’s killed us. If we played the 2022 trade season properly and traded away anyone who’d get us a pick, the 2025 Panthers would have had a team with multiple additional 1st round picks and other picks and we actually could have gone even further.

Nothing convoluted in that. 

So you are saying we should have torn down and done a full rebuild. Were you saying that at the time or making that judgement in hindsight? 
 

The way it all happened was not simple. You are suggesting a simple plan, but that isn’t how it played out. 
 

If you are doing that you ride Rhule down to the bottom, which wasn’t done either.  Brother I will repeat, it a convoluted mess. The Burns thing alone took a year and a half to play out. 

 

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I say trade back later in the 1st round if someone wants to come up and get someone falling. Pick Blake Miller with that pick, who people are comparing to Lane Johnson. Go LB next, either the Stache or Hill. Then go C, S, or Edge in the third. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, NorthTryon said:

I say trade back later in the 1st round if someone wants to come up and get someone falling. Pick Blake Miller with that pick, who people are comparing to Lane Johnson. Go LB next, either the Stache or Hill. Then go C, S, or Edge in the third. 

pray someone falls in love with Simpson

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...