Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers re-sign 2 WR's


Recommended Posts

 

5 hours ago, MHS831 said:

So I am guessing we go with:

TMac

XL  

Coker

Tremayne (17 targets, 14 receptions, 160 yards--not bad)

Horn

XXXXXXXXXX

 

 

 

5 hours ago, Joe Bear said:

Not in that order. 

If its in that order, I'm writing Canales a strongly worded letter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, MHS831 said:

So I am guessing we go with:

TMac

XL  

Coker

Tremayne (17 targets, 14 receptions, 160 yards--not bad)

Horn

XXXXXXXXXX

 

 

This is a pretty good WR room, IMO. I can see us picking up a mid tier vet since this list is so young and drafting a WR on day 3. Your guy Eli Heidenreich piqued my interest, I haven't looked that far down the line yet. As always, we'll churn the bottom of the roster / PS with a few UDFA and other teams' cast offs.

I also sincerely hope someone is willing to trade for XL. My heart has been broken (and almost my TV) by him too many times. I've lost all trust in him at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

I like Tremayne on the outside and wish he would get more of XLs snaps

he catches everything thrown to him....had 17 targets and 14 receptions for 160 yards. XL has the tools to be really good--not sure about inside the helmet though

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

he catches everything thrown to him....had 17 targets and 14 receptions for 160 yards. XL has the tools to be really good--not sure about inside the helmet though

Yeah - Tremayne was very reliable at catching the ball when it was thrown his way. Still not sure he is able to get open at a good rate, but at least he seems to have his head on a swivel (unlike XL)

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If XL doesn’t come in with a chip on his shoulder and being real serious about getting his spot back, do what you want to with him. 
Because if he doesn’t respond to this setback he never will respond. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

Yeah - Tremayne was very reliable at catching the ball when it was thrown his way. Still not sure he is able to get open at a good rate, but at least he seems to have his head on a swivel (unlike XL)

Yeah, you have to assume he was not facing many shutdown CBs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, strato said:

If XL doesn’t come in with a chip on his shoulder and being real serious about getting his spot back, do what you want to with him. 
Because if he doesn’t respond to this setback he never will respond. 

To have all the tools and you still can't get the job done--BUT if the light does come on--and some WRs take time--we could be scary.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...