Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

REPORT: Panthers going after Browns TE David Njoku

TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

trucpfan Mentor

trucpfan

Posted
Posted
38 minutes ago, Jay Roosevelt said:

They're not trying to give Bryce any excuses this year.

Let’s rephrase this Morgan wants to win he knows what it takes to win. He’s putting every piece in place to be able to battle the top NFC teams weather Bryce does his job is up to him he doesn’t we don’t succeed he doesn’t get a big contract. He does his thing we play late into the playoffs and Bryce is pad like a top 13-16 QB

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheSpecialJuan Grand Master

TheSpecialJuan

Posted
  • Author
Posted

You can see what the front office is trying to do here: go after Njoku or Okonkwo. If we land one of them, we cut Tommy Tremble and use his $6 million in cap space toward the new deal. If we miss out, we keep Tremble. Either way, there’s a good chance we end up upgrading at that spot

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheSpecialJuan Grand Master

TheSpecialJuan

Posted
  • Author
Posted
11 minutes ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

You can see what the front office is trying to do here: go after Njoku or Okonkwo. If we land one of them, we cut Tommy Tremble and use his $6 million in cap space toward the new deal. If we miss out, we keep Tremble. Either way, there’s a good chance we end up upgrading at that spot

its impressive to see a competent front office make decisions 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Swaggasaurus Experienced

Swaggasaurus

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Mills said:

Add that to Evans, Tremble, and Sanders and the TR room becomes crowded. Gotta think JT is the odd man out in that scenario.

Should be….but Tommy’s got what they call a “cap number”. He’s a good move tight end/HBack for us and a hell of a lot more important than JT. Got to make the dollars make sense tho.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
strato Grand Master

strato

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Is this really a thing?  I must have missed it.

It is why/how we got Greg Olsen from Chicago - Martz was running their offense and didn’t value him. 

Edited by strato
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Is this really a thing?  I must have missed it.

Yeah, there are several posters who don't think TE is a need at all because Canales doesn't use them. I mean, given our TE roster of course our TE usage in the passing game is going to be limited. We have a roster full of third stringers. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • jb2288
      Time to Sign David Njoku

      By jb2288 · Posted

      He can’t even learn to run routes. No chance in hell he can do both that and pick up blocking schemes 
    • MrBubba
      OFFICIAL 2026 Undrafted Free Agent Thread

      By MrBubba · Posted

      Well he had essentially a 70% completion rate for almost three thousand yards.  Biggest issues were awkward and inconsistent release.  I wouldn't call arm strength bad, but not great.    
    • strato
      Bryce Young 5th year option exercised

      By strato · Posted

      I see him being better and most of that is a few downfield passes that were seemingly non existent.    But it is what is around him that has dictated the trajectory more than the quarterbacking. He is game manager level and unable to dictate to defenses.  And even if I am wrong and he is the reason we ‘upwarded’, we are bumping our heads on the ceiling and only making meager gains. If it is an incline it is awfully shallow degree wise. Like a finance graph that tracks your progress and hovers around the rate of inflation. Barely breaking even.  Is that where you want your money?  We make up these deadlines expectations and generally he does the minimum of what he needs to do to hang around.    It does not encourage me to believe that when we get into a game against a good run d that we cannot break down with our run game, to believe that we can pivot to the air and successfully counter their strategy.  But they run it back again. Of course I am gunshy of a repeat of the same thing we have watched for three years.    oh, and yes his durability is his most impressive positive for my money. I fear the other shoe dropping on that and the contractual consequences that will follow.   Last  of all, too late to edit my mistake here but would like to acknowledge it: the last three years has done very little to convince me that I was not wrong in not wanting him. One too many “not”s. 
×
×
  • Create New...