Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dane Bruegler’s 3rd draft with writeups from ‘The Beast’ in Athletic


Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, Jon Snow said:

The Panthers have not had a top 30 visit with any of those guys yet. Miller is a possibility I suppose. I think they have their eye on the NCS TE. If they go oline in the 3rd I hope it's for a center. I would not be surprised if they took Rodriguez at 19 either. 

I hope they draft another Notre dame TE for the hell of it 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, raleigh-panther said:

It is in the Athletic…paywall.  I subscribe to it

i can look up something if you want me too

I sub too, I just couldn’t find it. I saw rankings, the whole download the Beast thing, but no 3 round mock. Google didn’t help. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Too late to edit the above post. So…

NM I just found it. Passed on Proctor for the Clemson guy. Mildly confused there. In a bad way. 

 We passed on Golday for a TE. Not confused there, hate it. 

Passed on true C Slaughter for the G. I mean, if they want the G to be a C and feel like he is superior athletically for the position, I get it. Grade = Incomplete without that info.

Edited by strato
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, strato said:

Too late to edit the above post. So…

NM I just found it. Passed on Proctor for the Clemson guy. Mildly confused there. In a bad way. 

 We passed on Golday for a TE. Not confused there, hate it. 

Passed on true C Slaughter for the G. I mean, if they want the G to be a C and feel like he is superior athletically for the position, I get it. Grade = Incomplete without that info.

Proctor, Golday, & Slaughter sounds like one hell of a draft! I don't get it either.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel like everyone keeps projecting Stowers or Sadiq to us. I just don't see it - I think we value in-line TEs more than most teams (and why our coaching staff likes Tremble and Evans). I think Klare is probably the only top 100 talent TE we could potentially draft. Maybe a day 3 pick on Roush, Raridon, or Delp

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, strato said:

Too late to edit the above post. So…

NM I just found it. Passed on Proctor for the Clemson guy. Mildly confused there. In a bad way. 

 We passed on Golday for a TE. Not confused there, hate it. 

Passed on true C Slaughter for the G. I mean, if they want the G to be a C and feel like he is superior athletically for the position, I get it. Grade = Incomplete without that info.

I'm kind of surprised Proctor is still graded as a 1st round talent. I highly doubt this guy makes it as a tackle in the NFL - his pass protection has many red flags and I think he will easily be beat like a drum by speed rushers (the Oklahoma edge rusher showed us proof of that, and by no means is he an elite pass rusher). I feel like all of the Bama tackles are top heavy with good strength but don't succeed at tackle in the NFL.

That being said, I do think somebody reaches on Proctor just because he is freaking massive. He could be a very good guard, but those can be found outside of round 1. If you are drafting him because you think he will be able to play tackle, good luck to you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

I'm kind of surprised Proctor is still graded as a 1st round talent. I highly doubt this guy makes it as a tackle in the NFL - his pass protection has many red flags and I think he will easily be beat like a drum by speed rushers (the Oklahoma edge rusher showed us proof of that, and by no means is he an elite pass rusher). I feel like all of the Bama tackles are top heavy with good strength but don't succeed at tackle in the NFL.

That being said, I do think somebody reaches on Proctor just because he is freaking massive. He could be a very good guard, but those can be found outside of round 1. If you are drafting him because you think he will be able to play tackle, good luck to you

I’m not scouting them myself. I quit spending hours and hours on that all the way back when Hurney would trade out of a pick and all my ‘scouting’ was worthless. I did do 2023 because it was unique. 
 

I heard the stuff you are saying and then I read some stuff that went counter to it. It is probably more that I didn’t think the Clemson guy was rated that high. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/8/2026 at 4:47 PM, Aussie Tank said:

Unless the bloke can cover 4 positions across the line for injury is the only way I'd take him this year and Proctor the big unit probably could 

 

Proctor is my exception, but my ass GM job does have enough security......

Its about 2 weeks away, me thinks you will start hearing from all the "experts" " Teams really like proctor more than the mockers, watch him for a top 10 pick blah blah blah". 

Need a star like fall for his services, besides he can play WR/TE

 

 

He's got some RB plays too........come on Dan get him!!!

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Basbear said:

 

Proctor is my exception, but my ass GM job does have enough security......

Its about 2 weeks away, me thinks you will start hearing from all the "experts" " Teams really like proctor more than the mockers, watch him for a top 10 pick blah blah blah". 

Need a star like fall for his services, besides he can play WR/TE

 

 

He's got some RB plays too........come on Dan get him!!!

lol.  What do you think that DB is thinking….

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, raleigh-panther said:

lol.  What do you think that DB is thinking….

Screw it put BOTH of them as running back in the I formation ...... If I was on defense, "Timeout TIMEOUT TIMEOUT!!, my hamstring suddenly got tight coach, no idea why...."

Edited by Basbear
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/9/2026 at 5:50 PM, Basbear said:

Screw it put BOTH of them as running back in the I formation ...... If I was on defense, "Timeout TIMEOUT TIMEOUT!!, my hamstring suddenly got tight coach, no idea why...."

Nah the cleats. You always, always blame the cleats.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
    • Reasonable. I mean I didn’t see a clear path to relief this season myself. As I have typed already, I think the QB FA class is more interesting next season and that draft is supposed to be stacked as well. There just weren’t many options this year.  When you have Tepper to contend with you have to tread lightly around this unless you are 100% certain and willIng to stake your job on it.   There were a couple of outings that helped Bryce a lot in terms of  thinking maybe he can do this, and if you are a supporter you are giving them a lot of weight. You are likely to think just get him some more help and he can do that every week. Which I think Tepper falls into that category.  And the playoffs, division champs, regardless of the way I see that, the supporters will also give that a lot of weight.    And the big one, the atmosphere In BOA for that WC game, Tepper had to be soiling himself over that. If you pulled Bryce out right now you had better be right and your new guy had better make the playoffs and look good doing it or you will be gone and your chance to build your old team back into respectability will be gone too.  So here we have Pickett on a one year deal, and Grier and King. I understand it.  
×
×
  • Create New...