Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Foxworth says players are ready to talk now


eViL jEsTeR

Recommended Posts

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/03/19/foxworth-says-players-are-ready-to-talk-now/

In the same interview during which (as Rosenthal pointed out earlier) Ravens cornerback Domonique Foxworth said that the players are fine with never being a union again (it’s impressive that he has been able to ask all of them that question), Foxworth explains that “we’ve expressed that we’re ready to begin talks as soon as they’re ready.”
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Players do not get paid during the off season. Their base salaries are paid with what we know as "game checks" and they collect those either on a weekly or bi-weekly basis, depending on their team.

Players are paid during the regular season per their contract salaries. The league pays players their playoff salaries as established each year. For example, the Colts received $73k per man and the Bears received $38k per man in their 2007 Super Bowl.

Don't forget that players also have incentives built into their contracts, some of which are related to the post season.

But, the reality for NFL players- there is no steady paycheck from Week 17 through September of the next season.

Antonio Pierce described the entire player pay system at length on ESPN Radio a couple weeks ago- interesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...