Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trading Down


Delhommey

Recommended Posts

So without a CBA you cannot trade players, but did you know there won't be a draft next year until an agreement is reached? You can't trade picks from a draft that doesn't exist. All trades would currently have to be done with this year's picks alone.

Trading down will be nightmarishly difficult without a CBA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The draft is not a CBA thing--we are having one this year, right?

I will reiterate what I have said before in much less detail. If we trade down, I would insist on a second rounder and a first rounder in 2012 as a necessary part of the deal. The reason? If we trade down and need a QB again next year, we are likely picking in the top 10. The first rounder we would acquire should be enough to trade up and get a franchise QB then. I am guessing we would have enough to get the first, second, or third pick in the draft, which should guarantee us a top QB.

If we do not get the first rounder and finish 7-9 with bad QB play, we have the 15th pick and the opportunity to get a franchise QB is gone. In other words, we are dropping 5-10 spots and getting a second rounder. We should still get a Fairley, Peterson, Green, Quinn, Bowers, and possibly a Dareus or a Gabbert or Newton. The first rounder is insurance. In 2012, if we do not need a QB because we solved it, we have 2 first rounders. That could be the start of a dynasty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The draft is not a CBA thing--we are having one this year, right?

I will reiterate what I have said before in much less detail. If we trade down, I would insist on a second rounder and a first rounder in 2012 as a necessary part of the deal. The reason? If we trade down and need a QB again next year, we are likely picking in the top 10. The first rounder we would acquire should be enough to trade up and get a franchise QB then. I am guessing we would have enough to get the first, second, or third pick in the draft, which should guarantee us a top QB.

If we do not get the first rounder and finish 7-9 with bad QB play, we have the 15th pick and the opportunity to get a franchise QB is gone. In other words, we are dropping 5-10 spots and getting a second rounder. We should still get a Fairley, Peterson, Green, Quinn, Bowers, and possibly a Dareus or a Gabbert or Newton. The first rounder is insurance. In 2012, if we do not need a QB because we solved it, we have 2 first rounders. That could be the start of a dynasty.

Actually the reason we are having the draft this year is because it said they would in the last CBA even in a situation like this (to me that doesn't seem to make sense but that is what was reported).

Also Chris Mortensen addressed this to someone on twitter today and he said that the only draft pick that can be traded is in this year's draft if a new CBA is not reached because the draft is part of the CBA. So if we did trade back we could receive no future picks which might lessen the possibility that we do indeed trade out of the pick.

MHS does that change you opinion of trading back if Mort is correct?? Honest question no snark intended. :)

RT @lde857: @mortreport @Micah_J_D Next year's draft is not provided for in expired CBA. So can't trade next yr's picks w/o new CBA.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually the reason we are having the draft this year is because it said they would in the last CBA even in a situation like this (to me that doesn't seem to make sense but that is what was reported).

Also Chris Mortensen addressed this to someone on twitter today and he said that the only draft pick that can be traded is in this year's draft if a new CBA is not reached because the draft is part of the CBA. So if we did trade back we could receive no future picks which might lessen the possibility that we do indeed trade out of the pick.

MHS does that change you opinion of trading back if Mort is correct?? Honest question no snark intended. :)

Yes. And the people on this thread make very good points. This is the most messed up crap I have ever seen. The only way I would feel good about having the first pick and not taking a QB would be if I knew I postioned myself to take one the following year should my veteran not pan out. I think We have to take a QB now. Good work, Teeray.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In fairness, this is the year Brown needs to show what he can do, so I will reserve judgement until the season is well underway. Armanti was resented by Fox and Davidson, so maybe the fresh start will do him some good. Let him focus on 1 thing (WR) and not throw WR, Wildcat, and PR at him all at once. there could be something there. Even if he becomes a pro bowler, it was a stupid trade, however.

Here is what bothers me about Hurney:

1. Trading in the first to get a RT

2. Trading a first to get E Brown when FSU DEs nearly always bust

3. Not seeing what others who needed a QB saw in Jimmy Clausen that caused them not to take him in the second round. I heard he offered the Rams our first rounder in 2011 to move up in the second round (a la Brown) and the Rams declined.

4. Trading up to get Armanti Edwards. He would have been there in the fourth round-probably sixth round. If he was taken, so what. NE fans are laughing at us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nice.  Allar is intriguing.  He's a medical red flag.  I'm not sure when he would be available.  However, we aren't moving off Bryce at least until '27, so he'd have time.  I'd be shocked if Young is not our starting QB next year.The OL needs some reinforcement, I agree . Moton's contract is a beast as well as the guards we signed in FA.  Corbett is hurt all the time and BC is nice depth, but a mediocre starter.  Defense is a must.  You hit some critical areas--Edge, LB, CB.  I would like to see another safety as well.
    • I don’t know how people could not see it. I am no draft scout and never claimed to be.  It is a situation where when you look at him, what does he have physically that is better than NFL average? Nothing that I could see.  Not foot speed. Not arm strength.  Then you look at his size and it is well below all but Murray in my memory for the modern NFL era.  Murray has the plus athleticism/quickness and a plus  arm. I still wouldn’t want him because of his size.   But Bryce had none of that to offset his size.  So okay now that I have assessed Bryce I don’t want him. It was a simple checklist. Except I see all this talk that they might take him. So now I decide I need to look at him closer.  Pro day video… I see what I called a skip step. A little extra move on the deep pass. I look at the velocity of his throws, NFL average is being kind. I look at that footwork and it is big time wonky.  So there you are, lower ball velocity in my opinion   That adds time in a league where guys are timed down to the 100th of a second. Not a plus. It is questionable. Then the extra move on the deep balls which is time, in the face of pressure, and space, also in the face of pressure…  it is a stack of negatives and the guy had nothing athletically to offset it. And it is the 1.1 of the NFL draft where there has  never been a successful player with his attributes at his position, in the modern era.  In his case you don’t have to be a super scout. You just had to look and think about him in relationship to the NFL game.    I never watched him in college and think that prevented me from rationalizing things. I had no bias in that regard and I believe others might have.    Combine that with a personal opinion that the SEC is not the NFL and there was no automatic approval  because of the level of competition level he faced….    On that front I feel there are single digit examples of guys who truly could be in the NFL in their final year of college. The freaks. The rest of them… take what they were their fist NFL camp and give the a season in the league and an offseason with the resources and standards of NFL conditioning and strength programs and compare them to a year before… you will see a difference. And they aren’t finished growing either so that plays into it.  It is was a bunch of factors that just equaled do not do this. It gets a lot harder if he had the size to measure up to these normal prospects with the prototypical physiques, and the cannon arm, etc. I never could claim to be good at eyeballing comparisons between two players like that.   Bryce was such a unique situation. Anyway that was the process.   Looking at guys that people compared him to was also informative, since Brees was the big one. And if you honestly look at Brees and his size, people comparing the two like they are 1 to 1, it was smoke. I am always suspicious of smoke blowing, when I find it.  Saying I was not special I just used my brain and eyes and they are not special either. So I had a very hard time understanding what people were thinking. 
×
×
  • Create New...