Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers flying to meet with Green.

Cat'sGrowl

By Cat'sGrowl,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Cat'sGrowl Newbie

Cat'sGrowl

Posted
Posted

http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcsouth/post/_/id/19312/a-j-green-next-up-on-carolinas-list

Hurney admitted Green is one of the five to seven players the Panthers are considering at the No. 1 pick. Although recent private and public workouts of Auburn’s Cam Newton and Missouri’s Blaine Gabbert have a lot of people thinking the Panthers have decided on taking a quarterback, Hurney said that’s not the case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Lout Newbie

Lout

Posted
Posted

if bowers, quinn, and fairley are all out, who are the 5-7?

mallett, newton, gabbert, peterson, green, dareus, von miller maybe?

It could be only 5 prospects.. he did say 5-7. I don't think Von Miller is on our draft board. I don't think Quinn and Bowers are legit possibilities. We are very young at DE. DT is a much bigger need than DE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
OchoNueve Newbie

OchoNueve

Posted
Posted

Does going from 7-9 prospects down to 5-7 increase or decrease the smokescreen? Or does it create a whole new screen of smoke all together? Maybe instead of a large bellowing smokescreen this would be better compared to more of a dense fog where you think you can see through, but actually you can't.

These are the important clues we must interpret in order to understand who will be #1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • cardiackat88.
      Well, the Niners just doomed themselves to mediocrity

      By cardiackat88. · Posted

      Teams do some super stupid stuff with mid-fairly good QBs. I think they are just absolutely terrified they will be stuck with a QB that is not the quality of the QB they have now, even if its someone like Daniel Jones. Lots of trash QBs go in the first round. I encourage you to take a look at the sad, sad list of first round QBs in the last 15 years.  
    • Joe Bear
      Okay, now face the facta guyd

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • ForJimmy
      JJ Jansen on tanking

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
×
×
  • Create New...