Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Games of Draft season


MHS831

Recommended Posts

One last note: Back in the early 80’s when ESPN started televising the draft, Paul Zimmerman of Sports Illustrated was one of their analysts. Paul would call the GM’s of teams he was close to and ask them who they were going to draft in the first round. When those teams’ turns came up Paul would say “they were going to take so and so because the GM told me that last night.” When the team took another player Paul looked so disillusioned and would then say, “I can’t believe it, they told me they were taking the other guy…why would they lie to me?” He found out the hard way that there are more lies than truths being told this time of year when it comes to the draft.

I love that quote, lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love that quote, lol.

Basically, if you don't know it to be true for a fact, do not believe a word. Lotta articles, qoutes, etc. that are the cornerstones of arguments on here are fluffy lies. I guess it depends on your level of gullibility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i'd say it's a lot like a poker game among friends. you say a lot of things, some of them outrageous and some of them absolutely true. you are equally easy to read if you say only true things than if you only say b.s. things. so you throw out a bit of both.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you got to bring an article over a fad going on, thats OD... theres also truths being told.

It states that there are truths as well. Just like in poker. The best rule, as stated, is to not believe a thing unless you KNOW it to be true.

And The other colbert makes a good point: I wonder how many minds are changed in the war room.

If we don't have a CBA, we won't be able to work out a contract before the draft, so that might add to the suspense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Common wisdom is after the first round GMs constantly making changes as players go off the board and offers are made. And there is a lot of smokescreening around. But that isn't a primary issue when you are talking the top 3 picks and youknow who is going to there no matter what. Sure you keep folks gurssing until you make your mind and even then you might make a trade if the price is worth is.

But to assume we are doing a lot of smokescreening isn't necessarily true. I suspect we have told some truth along the way as well. Chances are we might still not know what we are going to do right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But to assume we are doing a lot of smokescreening isn't necessarily true. I suspect we have told some truth along the way as well. Chances are we might still not know what we are going to do right now.

I agree, but would add that to assume that we are telling the truth is probably naive. If we are telling the truth, we hare telling Half truths, anyway. If a team wants a certain QB and they think we want him, they will offer us a trade. If we tell everyone what we are doing because we have the first pick, they might offer the trade to Denver. Unless you want offers, There is no real need to smokescreen with the first pick. I also agree that they probably do not know for sure yet.

I think you have to remember the players the press likes to pimp so they have stories and sell papers; they will be the subject of questions and these questions form headlines. I imagine there are players we like who have never been asked about, so there is no ink about them at all. Nobody was talking about Beason a few years back or Stewart, or Otah that much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just like in poker someone with enough experience can figure out what's true and what's not listening to people that are let's say less-experienced. It's almost always better to just keep your mouth shut period.

Playing poker I knew a guy that would tell you in the middle of hand what his cards were. He always lied, but with that you could figure out what he DIDN'T have. I can beat everything except a flush, this guy is bragging about how he has a flush, well then, I know I have the best hand. Not that complicated.

Like this:

I would never talk about players we liked only about the players we didn’t like. And I would always talk very favorably about them.

Terrible move. I would chat this guy up at any chance. If he shied away from talking about a player, changed the subject ect. then you know it's someone they like. If he goes on and on about how great someone is then you know it's a player they don't like. Playschool.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If he goes on and on about how great someone is then you know it's a player they don't like. Playschool.

and this is exactly why so many people were originally calling what Rivera was doing a smoke screen; it is very very typical to talk up guys you don't like to a ridiculous extent when it comes to the draft.

fwiw, I don't know that was what Rivera was doing. He was just asked questions about Newton, and I see no reason why he would answer them negatively even if he didn't like the guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well the biggest thing Rivera has going for him is that he's a new HC so teams don't really have a bead on to how he actually drafts vs. how he talks up guys. Maybe he was being genuine, maybe he thought he was OK and just being nice, maybe he hates the guy and is throwing that out there as misinformation. We don't really know until you have a draft or two of history to compare what's said vs. who is actually drafted.

I still think the best move is to just keep your mouth shut. Give nothing away, keep other teams completely in the dark. Let them fall in love with a player and second guess themselves that you'll take them instead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still think the best move is to just keep your mouth shut. Give nothing away, keep other teams completely in the dark. Let them fall in love with a player and second guess themselves that you'll take them instead.

The article talks about that too (God gave you 2 ears and 1 mouth). I agree that you should keep it shut. However, it is Playschool, then poker players should analyze what we and other teams are going to do before the draft--it will be very interesting--to have experienced poker players highlight things that are BS and things that are true. They would have to decode specifics, etc. Sorta like that Liar TV show. In 5 weeks, we find out who is good and who is blowing smoke themselves! Don't know how to put that together, but it would be fun.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
×
×
  • Create New...