Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Giddings of Pro Scout Inc: Panthers were 10th in Personnel


mav1234

Recommended Posts

On tonight's Panther's Pulse, Hurney brought in son of superscout Mike Giddings to talk about the Panthers. He works with his father as a professional scout evaluating all 32 teams. They use a unique evaluation system featuring a color coded system, as well as a numbered system. For more on that, see below.

I tried to take notes during the interview with him, but these are incomplete. Still thought they were interesting, and worth sharing.

Blue players are best; have ten or more blues to really compete is the goal.

Panthers personnel in 2010 were #10 in personnel. 22 starters, punter, kicker, return specialist, then take 8 defensive backups and 7 defensive backups. each player has color and numerical grade. When all numeric scores added up, Panthers were #10.

All teams have 8 needs that Pro Scouts Inc outlines, Panthers #1 need last year last year was QB, was not filled. if no QB you can win with or who can win for you, difficult to have consistency in getting to the playoffs.

Would say there is a quarterback on the roster that could win. If system fits Jimmy, capable of being a red(Solid Starter in this ranking system) quarterback. Had a positive line about what Moore showed in 2009. Hurney starts defending Clausen about how hard it is to be a rookie QB. Giddings adds young QBs usually have a good outlet TE that can move the chains, cites TB, NYJ, etc. At the end, it's mentioned that we just picked up Shockey.

Made me curious about Giddings' system so I did some digging and came across a funny link..

On Giddings' system, for those interested, including an article older than some (most? haha) posters on this board about the start of the system:

A blue player is a star or superstar, and any part of his anatomy or his technique so colored is likewise outstanding. A red is a solid starter. A gray means, "Don't quit on him now, but he doesn't match up with a red." An orange is a comer; he does some things that would make him a starter, others that don't match up. A green is a "forever backup," and a yellow is a CP, or Can't Play. There may be a plus or a minus attached to a color, or an arrow indicating "ascending" or "descending," meaning the player is on the rise or the wane. An orange ascending, for instance, means a young player getting better. An orange descending? Forget it.

Read more: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/vault/article/magazine/MAG1125863/index.htm#ixzz1IDuCXxPO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this really puts an emphasis on what Hurney and Rivera have been saying all along: yes, we have some holes, but we aren't as far off as some outside the organization think.

despite all our disagreement about Qbs lately I think we can all agree that this roster isn't complete poo and is not a decade from competing, thankfully.

I think I'm in the minority, but I do think a solid upgrade at QB could turn this team into a winning club capable of competing for the division immediately if Rivera's defensive billing lives up to the hype.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's just because you are already factoring in how good we'll be when we draft Cam Newton. :D

I actually think that makes us a worse team next year but that is for another thread.

If the right moves are made this offseason, we will contend for the playoffs next season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the right moves are made this offseason, we will contend for the playoffs next season.

I think this, too. While we are hampered by being in the division we are in, we've got a damn good D with just one or two upgrades.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this really puts an emphasis on what Hurney and Rivera have been saying all along: yes, we have some holes, but we aren't as far off as some outside the organization think.

What, you mean the guys on NFL Network are wrong when they say we need an upgrade at every single position? :eek:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...