Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Charlotte Observer: Fact or Fiction


pantherfan81

Recommended Posts

Cam Newton comes to town this week for the job interview that could make him the first pick in this month's NFL draft.

He'll talk football with the Carolina Panthers, who own that pick, but perhaps as many of the questions will be about off-the-field topics. From controversies at each college stop to scouting reports that border on personal attacks, Newton has always been in the eye of the storm, for reasons that only occasionally involve his play.

The Panthers have to decide if the potential payoff is worth the alleged risk.

"They want to know everything; They want to know who I really am," Newton said when asked what teams want to see when he makes in-house visits. "During this whole process, I've done a lot of explaining of who I really am. And I'm extremely comfortable with that, because I know this is a multi-million dollar investment, and they have to know who they're picking.

"You know, it's fun, and I look forward to talking to team after team about who I really am."

Who that is depends on who you listen to.

Former coaches describe him as a grinder and a leader. Critics call him a thief and a phony. Game tape shows a different kind of athlete, a quarterback who could change the way the position is played.

When he arrives in Charlotte on Tursday, he'll have a chance to state his case, including during a meeting with owner Jerry Richardson.

Read more: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2011/04/02/2192205/newton-fact-or-fiction.html#ixzz1IPsSp8DZ
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Am I the only one that doesn't see Cam Newton "redefining" the quarterback position, even if he becomes an elite QB?

People have been throwing that idea around for years, and it's never happened. And these days, with the rules changed to heavily favor passing, I strongly doubt that it ever will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are reasons bigger than Cam Newton that are redefining the QB position. In 20 years there will be more Cam Newtons than Andrew Lucks in the NFL. It has a lot more to do with the changes to college football offenses and the willingness or even necessity to have athletes at the QB position.

Even pro style schools like UNC have changed their recruiting to target more athletes at the position.

Pretty soon the NFL will have little choice but to evolve because the amount of classical pocket passers available will be diminished.

20 years ago almost all college QBs were drop back passers. Now they are a rarity.

Even Andrew Luck is a more mobile type QB.

I could write 20 pages on this but I will cut it off there. :p

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do you think that being a mobile QB is somehow redefining the position?

I don't think mobile quarterbacks are redefining the position as much as the position in college is evolving to where the premium is on mobile QBs.

An athlete with Cam Newton's attributes would have never played QB 20 years ago. He would have become a reciever or a TE. Not that he isn't a capable QB but an athlete like that back then would be more beneficial to the team at another position.

But as offenses continue to evolve in college there is more emphasis on athletic QBs. Before long there will be more athletes at QB like Cam than traditional drop back passers like Mallett. I am not implying drop back passers will become obsolete, but there will be less of them bc there is less demand for them in the college game.

Then if Luck busts you will see a big change on how the QB position is evaluated in the future.

Again these are just cliff notes. It would take several pages to make my case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not exactly sure that is an honest assesment of the talent he had to work with that year. Olsen had over 1100 yards that season making the PB, Stewart had close to 1100 total yards also going to the PB. He had Kalil at C who went to the PB, Trai Turner at RG who also went to the PB, and Michael Oher at LT who played well enough that the Panthers offered him a new contract the following year. I wouldn't call that a trash OL. He also played with a defense that was stacked with talent as well.   "The thing we are doing better this time around is actually surrounding our #1 overall draft pick QB with talent vs. asking him to completely carry the offense. I just hope that effort is leading us to realize that the guy isn't even good enough to get carried." Please.... Did you not read the list of names Newton had to work with his rookie season. I guess you missed it so I will post it again for you... Steve Smith (PB), Greg Olsen (PB), Brandon LaFell, Ted Ginn JR, Deangelo Williams (PB), Jonathan Stewart (PB), Jordan Grossn (PB), Ryan Kalil (PB) on the offensive side and then he had Luke Kuechly (PB), Jon Beason (PB), Thomas Davis (PB), Star Lotulelei, Kawann Short ( PB ),Charles Johnson, Greg Hardy (PB ), Mike Mitchell, Josh Norman (PB)  For comparison, here is who Young had his first year.  Chuba Hubbard, DJ Chark, Jonathan Mingo, Adam Thielen, Hayden Hurst, Ikem Ekwonu, Chandler Zavala, Bradley Bozeman, Nash Jensen and Taylor Morton. Not a single PB player on the list and most of them aren't even playing any longer. Additionally, his HC was fired during the season and the defense was as bad as the offense.  You might not like the comparison but saying Newton had to completely carry the offense isn't exactly fair to the 4 pro bowlers on offense who played with him that year.
    • That's why I say we have to keep looking. Even if you believe Bryce is the guy, KP and Grier are not and who knows if King is anything more than a gimmick player, we should be active in improving our 2nd QB spot. Season ending injuries happen, and you don't just want to roll over and give it up. How many starters have we seen come from the ranks of backup? Having 2 potential starting QBs is one of the best problems we could have. 
    • Eh, it’s more on how bad the refs are. Some of these calls against the canes are no calls 
×
×
  • Create New...