Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

An NFL GM who's had a bad record in the second round...


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

...not named Marty Hurney.

Ravens haven't had success with second-round picks

Looking at the Ravens’ 14 second-round picks since their inaugural season in 1996, there are a handful of underperforming players and just one Pro Bowl player -- current starting running back Ray Rice. That’s not to say Newsome hasn’t found productive players in Round 2. But Rice is the only gem he has unearthed.

...

So if two weeks from now at the draft, Newsome again trades out of the first round for an extra second-rounder -- and some have speculated it could happen -- curb your enthusiasm. History shows it might not pay off big.

Ozzie Newsome is universally considered one of the best talent evaluators in the league, and deservedly so. But even Newsome isn't immune from whiffing, and more than once.

That's something worth keeping in mind when you're evaluating how Hurney has done as a GM.

Perspective.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...not named Marty Hurney.

Ravens haven't had success with second-round picks

Ozzie Newsome is universally considered one of the best talent evaluators in the league, and deservedly so. But even Newsome isn't immune from whiffing, and more than once.

That's something worth keeping in mind when you're evaluating how Hurney has done as a GM.

Perspective.

Cool. So if Ozzie Newsome had traded a 3rd round pick to select a player with a 5th round grade for a 2nd round pick that ended up being the first pick in the 2nd round, it really wouldn't have been that big of a deal because Ozzie sucks at drafting in the 2nd round anyways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The point isn't to suggest that Hurney hasn't made mistakes.

The point is that even the best GMs make them.

I chronicled several of Hurney's just recently, but I still think he's a good GM overall. Just not perfect.

People expecting perfection are going to be disappointed, no matter what team they sheer for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Make excuses all you want Hurney has made some horrible decisons the last couple of years. Tagging Pep then extending Turnover Jake. Trading a 1st for Brown then a 2nd for Edwards. Even last year not trading Dwill when the Packers were desperate (allegedly). I'm not saying he's terrible (I would put him in the middle of the pack) but I really don't understand why people on here are so quick to defend him. He's average nothing more nothing less.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Fanthink" tends to make people believe one of two things.

A) We rule, and everyone else stinks

B) We suck, and everyone else is better than us

when you look objectively at situations around the league, watch full games with other teams, and read news from all over rather than just Panther news, it helps to unskew the perspective a little. That's the point that I think this article helps to make.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's a difference between "not having much success" and being as brutally awful as Hurney has been. His 2nd round picks:

2002: DeShaun Foster

2003: Bruce Nelson

2004: Keary Colbert

2005: Eric Shelton

2006: Richard Marshall

2007: Dwayne Jarrett, Ryan Kalil

2008: None, traded so we could get Jeff Otah

2009: Everette Brown (traded 1st rounder to pick), Sherrod Martin

2010: Jimmy Clausen

2011: None, traded so we could get Armanti Edwards

Jesus tapdancing Christ that's terrible. Without Kalil, this would be wretchedly bad on the level of '90s Bengals, '70s Bucs, Matt Millen Lions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • if  ANYONE actually goes & looks at the FACTS on rookie Qb's after 2 full seasons as a starter in the NFL & they are still well below average do they rarely ever actually become top tier Qb's & instead most likely either do not recieve a second contract & or become life long backups...just saying 
    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
×
×
  • Create New...