Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cardinals may have first dibs on Marc Bulger


Dpantherman

Recommended Posts

“A lot of people in the league feel the Cardinals already have an understanding with pending free agent Marc Bulger,” writes Pasquarelli. “The Cardinals would have liked to sign Bulger last year, and coach Ken

Whisenhunt lobbied for a deal, but Arizona had already agreed with Derek Anderson and management didn’t see a way to bring in two veterans.”

Having “an understanding” with a player is different than speaking to that player, who in this case is technically still a member of the Baltimore Ravens.

So this presumably wouldn’t be tampering.

But it does sound like it could come awfully close.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/28/cardinals-may-already-have-understanding-with-bulger/related/
Link to comment
Share on other sites

this is why you draft Cam.....b/c Bulger and Kolb (who actually doesn't have a better resume than Moore) are deemed the FA/trade answers.

What if we draft Cam, sign Bulger, and go Bulger\Cam\Clausen as our QB's next year? One way or the other, I think a vet should be signed and Bulger isn't a bad option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What if we draft Cam, sign Bulger, and go Bulger\Cam\Clausen as our QB's next year? One way or the other, I think a vet should be signed and Bulger isn't a bad option.

that would be fine....that is about all you can get out of someone like Bulger. Carolina will need to find that old QB when they draft Cam. Bulger isn't an answer but he could help hand the keys over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

cards will go after some vet and run a spread offense. it worked with warner pretty well. i actually see them bringing in mcnabb, but i wouldn't be surprised to see bulger there. easy and cheap solution. i just don't see them going after a young Qb...esp. drafting one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, if we do draft Cam, we HAVE to sign a vet to teach him. Moore and Clausen have nothing they can help Cam with. Nothing. Jimmy sucked out loud, but if he had had a vet to tutor him last year maybe he would've done a TAD better. If we draft Newton and do the same with him, it'll only hurt the kid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, if we do draft Cam, we HAVE to sign a vet to teach him. Moore and Clausen have nothing they can help Cam with. Nothing. Jimmy sucked out loud, but if he had had a vet to tutor him last year maybe he would've done a TAD better. If we draft Newton and do the same with him, it'll only hurt the kid.
as long as the vet stayed on the sidelines i'd be happy. for sure newton needs an experienced set of eyes carrying the clipboard to help him know what to look for...but i think the whole mentor QB thing is a bit overrated. teaching and mentoring is the job of the coaches. any coach worth a crap will be enough to help a player get where they need to be if that player is at all capable of reaching their potential.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

as long as the vet stayed on the sidelines i'd be happy. for sure newton needs an experienced set of eyes carrying the clipboard to help him know what to look for...but i think the whole mentor QB thing is a bit overrated. teaching and mentoring is the job of the coaches. any coach worth a crap will be enough to help a player get where they need to be if that player is at all capable of reaching their potential.

Coaches are older, coaches have a certain method, and coaches have other duties.......you can't put all that on just a QB coach. Old vets can help in the film room, practice field, after practice, etc. when coaches aren't always around. Plus, current football players relate different w/ players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I hear you and I have said the same thing at times, but blanket statements are accurate part of the time at best.  I have also coached kids who had the "tools" but they were slow and unproductive on the field--and a few adjustments to the scheme or teaching techniques, and the light comes on.  We call them "late bloomers."  Based on my limited experience, it should be called "coaching."  As a former coach, if you gave me kids with the tools and I could not get them to perform at the level of their ability, then I have failed.  The coaches know this, so their timetables to win may be shorter than the time they have to develop a player--I think a lot of talent goes down the disposal, which is why the success rate for drafted players is so low. In my view, based on my career as a professor and researcher, my job is to produce successful people for the workplace.   I use data to identify central problems and I use my relationships with my students to strengthen weaknesses.  I have a limited amount of time to do this before a decision is made about their development.  In this case, I would look at the variables (data and the situational influences unique to this individual that may have stunted growth) and not the ineffective player as the center of the problem.  The team has already interviewed him, talked to his college coaches, measured him, etc. So I would minimize the assumption that the kid is the problem and look at his system of support and teaching strategies.  Nobody wants to admit THEY might be the problem.  To blame a first-rounder for failing, you have to admit either you did not properly identify the prospect's potential (which is your job) or you were unable to prepare that prospect (with all the tools that got him the job) to succeed (also your job).  So are we going to blame the 24-year-old kid with all the tools to succeed for sucking or are we going to take responsibility for his success as his mentors and teachers?  
    • i was hoping they might bring robinson back but he went to the darkside.  They will need to sign a free agent as Evero does not like to start rookies.
    • Flexibility. If they don’t work out we simply walk away. If they look great we have the first crack at extending them. 
×
×
  • Create New...