Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trade Peppers for Matt Cassell?


rblee83

Recommended Posts

How's it going, guys? I'm a Pats fan in Boston, and there has been a lot of talk recently about the possibility of trading Cassel straight-up for Peppers. The general consensus is 99.9% Cassel will be traded this offseason, and there is no way the Pats will keep both him and Brady on the roster.

Having watched every snap Cassel played this year, he is the real deal. People who call him a "system QB" really weren't watching the games...

What do you guys think of the trade possibility? Here is a link to the thread on the Pats message board: http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-patriots/messageboard/10/216685-peppers-trade-rumor-radio.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, yes, I would. I don't quite understand you guys.

Look, I understand your "system QB" and your "he had one good year" arguments, I truly do. But would you really, really, rather have a 1st round pick that may or may not pan out to be anything (David Carr? Anyone?) or a QB that you at least seen have a great year, is young, and looks to have a promising future? Did anyone say Steve Young was a system QB when he took over when Montana left, just cause they had 2 good QB's? I mean, he may have been, but maybe it's because he had good coaching and a good vet to watch play.

To me, the chance is worth it. If you get a first from someone, you may get a good player, you may not, but if you take Cassel, and he pans out, you have a QB for 10 years and a good QB in the NFL is priceless. Sometimes you have to take chances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No.

HOWEVER...if the Pats were to trade Cassel to the Lions for a first-round pick and then include that in a package for Peppers (say, the first from Detroit (from the Cowboys) and a second round pick or so), I think the Panthers would be willing to deal.

this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, yes, I would. I don't quite understand you guys.

Look, I understand your "system QB" and your "he had one good year" arguments, I truly do. But would you really, really, rather have a 1st round pick that may or may not pan out to be anything (David Carr? Anyone?) or a QB that you at least seen have a great year, is young, and looks to have a promising future? Did anyone say Steve Young was a system QB when he took over when Montana left, just cause they had 2 good QB's? I mean, he may have been, but maybe it's because he had good coaching and a good vet to watch play.

To me, the chance is worth it. If you get a first from someone, you may get a good player, you may not, but if you take Cassel, and he pans out, you have a QB for 10 years and a good QB in the NFL is priceless. Sometimes you have to take chances.

Fox/Hurney have a perfect track record of developing their 1st round picks into, at a bare minimum, solid long term starters.

I'll take my chances with that verses a one hit wonder free agent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cassel's arm is very strong. Some people were saying he dinked and dunked too much, but that was part of the gameplan. Many teams put a lot of people on the line of scrimmage and blitzed him, so the Pats countered with quick throws in the 5-15 yard range. By the end of the season, teams were backing off more because Cassel got the ball out too quickly making quick reads.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cassell can't play in a John Fox offense. We don't throw to RBs and TE's much. Fox's offense is based off of running the ball and going downfield off the play action. Cassell struggled going downfield despite having the best deep guy in the league (Moss). He also imo has a lot of Carr's habits. When asked to look downfield he normally gives up and goes mobile if option 1 is immediately open.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is huge may not be a trap game but this plays a major part in what they want to do. If we can get some pressure on Sam we know what he does with pressure coming hit and heavy. Also we may be able to take the top off their defense a backup safety trying to stop TMac or Cooker over the top or forcing him to play the backend should allow us to run the ball somewhat effectively. Either they allow some runs or we take some shots and if Bryce and whoever can connect deep we’ll be in business for another big time win against a top notch opponent. Might not be a trap game but health travel game plans all play a major role in each weeks game plan and this week might be leaving our way. We’re missing some replaceable pieces they’re missing key anchors to the offense and defense major difference time to solidly ourselves at one of the top teams in the nfc tomorrow fellas buckle up.
    • Yes.  If I am not mistaken, we need to sign Coker to the ERFA tender and insist that XL spends his spring and summer at a WR camp and not Coon huntin on his four wheeler.  XL was raw when we picked him--which is why I wanted to go another direction--and we are seeing how raw.  He is basically learning a position.     The Panthers will make their move in 2026 to be an NFL powerhouse behind Bryce.  Bryce needs intelligent WRs who catch the ball.  That said, we need a solid #2 to challenge XL and make cutting him easy, if necessary.  A #2 WR (intented to be a #1 by now) with under 400 yards is embarrassing.   On offense, you have to ask, "Where can we get better?"  In my view, #2 WR, TE (although they are improving) and maybe C (again, if we re-sign Mays, he is trending up and at 26, entering his prime--I say stay with him and find competition later in the draft (not good for C).  OL depth maybe?  In other words, XL is a glaring weak spot.    
×
×
  • Create New...