Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Don't ever buy a brother printer


frash.exe

Recommended Posts

gah what a piece of fuging poo.

My father bought a Brother MFC 210 printer/copier/fax/toaster oven/whatever the hell else a few years ago. I guess the "MFC" stands for "motherfuging c*nt" because you'll exclaim that plenty when trying to use this machine.

what's wrong with it? where do i start? as soon as we got the damn thing the phantom paper jams were plentiful, 8 year long "cleaning" sessions are frequent, oh and by the way, when it cleans, it uses ink. is that fuging ridiculous or what? So even if you don't use it much, that son of a bitch will still swallow ink like there's no tomorrow. I was so pissed off one day i wrote a review about it on epinions.

I swear everytime I go up to the damn thing one of the 18 ink cartridges that are in there is out of ink, well, actually, the thing might be half-full, but the goddamn printer refuses to work if it doesn't have a new cartridge.

If I was the one that actually bought the thing I would've stuck it in the driveway and back my Impala right the fug over it. And with my crappy job, there's no budget for a new printer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You basically just highlighted most all printers you buy now. They are make cheap, very cheap. These places make their money off the ink now, not the hardware unfortunately. If you print quite often, getting 2 years out of a printer like this is good. They don't make them like they used too, I had a ink-ribbon printer a long time ago, and that thing was a beast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only good printer I've ever gotten was the most simple HP available in '97(no faxing/copying/etc, just prints) - it's still working fine.

well before we got this piece of crap we'd been using an HP inkjet we bought in 1994. The only reason we replaced it was because the resolution of images was really out of date by that time, it never had a hardware problem and would make do when it ran out of a certain color, but the technology was pretty much outstanding at the time we bought it. Also their cartridges were just a black ink one and a color ink one. That one color ink cartridge would last 3 or 4 times as long as the brother cartridges for the piece of garbage i use, or at least try to use.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have a couple of Dell printers that came with some systems we bought at the office and have been having trouble with the toner running out quickly. The inital batch of toner that came with them lasted forever, but now any new toner we buy is gone in a hurry...

I pretty much stick with HP printers and plotters and don't have too many issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

I swear everytime I go up to the damn thing one of the 18 ink cartridges that are in there is out of ink, well, actually, the thing might be half-full, but the goddamn printer refuses to work if it doesn't have a new cartridge.

This is why i wll never buy a brother again. When it thinks you are out of ink it stops working. From what I have read it does this when the toner is still half full. There are some tricks online like covering up certain holes with duct tape that will fool it for a while. But the toner life is really short...even when its not out of toner.

So i gotta go buy a toner carttridge. Big deal. The principal is Brother forces you to buy toner every so often whether you need it or not.

Oh yeah i am trying to print a report during busy season.

F U brother

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We use only HP at work and I only get HP at home. Ink cartridges are cheaper. At home, it's an inkjet-do-everything (wanted the copy feature) but all that HP wants running in the background was annoying. I uninstalled everything but the print driver. I can still scan through Scanners/Cameras in the control panel and it is so much easier.

One of our properties bought a brother some years ago that was supposed to do everything. Turns out it wouldn't scan to a pdf file which is death in our business. Part of my job is getting software/hardware working for 170 properties no matter what so I found a 3rd party program that allowed that brother to scan to pdf. When it stopped printing a year later, I had them throw it out.

Too bad you aren't in the Charlotte area. I have an old HP plain inkjet you could have. Check out your local Goodwill. They have older printers for $10 or less and you can find the drivers online. Just be sure to talk to them about returning it if it doesn't work.

And for God's sake, stay away from Lexmark. Worse than Brother. You'll need a 2nd/3rd job just to afford the toner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I see they blamed Slavin for the goal like I did. 
    • See this is the problem, you say "can't get off the line quick" and "can't separate quick" but in reality it's "he can get off the line better and create more separation" which are two completely different things. If he couldn't get off the line or separate, he wouldn't have put up the numbers he did and end up a Top 10 pick. But he can get better, and maybe more accurately, consistent with them both, and that will take his game to the next level.  These are things that are also much easier to improve once you get to the NFL than things like being a poor route runner or having bad hands, two of his strengths. Thinking he can't get open in the short passing game also shows you haven't watched enough tape on him, as he was used in that role so much in college with little issue getting open and making plays. And him not using his physicality as much isn't even something that hurts his game because he's so much more agile than a player of his size should be, which he used to his advantage.  Instead of throwing passes where he'd go up and box out a player like a TE or Mike Evans does, they use his athleticism and put the ball in places that only he can get to it, and he usually does (and yes, he'll still be able to do that against NFL DB's with his catch radius). But now that he's in the NFL, I'd like to see him get stronger and add that to his game because it also will help him take his game to another level. As I've said before, if he doesn't improve on those things at all, I think he's a Top 25 WR in this league, he's already that good.  But I think he'll improve on those things and be a perennial Top 10 WR and in his prime is considered and perform like Top 5 guy in some years. My expectations for him this year at 800 yards and 8 TDs (although I do think he'll get to 10 TDs) with a real chance at getting to 1,000.  But those expectations are because I think Thielen will lead the team in yards with close to 1k and XL/Coker each end up in the 500-600 range themselves, just too many mouths to feed this year for a rookie to dominate yardage, especially if we're running the ball well again. But if Thielen can't stay healthy or puts up sub 750 yards, then yea, my expectations for T-Mac likely shift to getting to 1k as a rookie.
    • Svech only 1 goal behind the guy they've pretty much already given the Conn Smythe to...
×
×
  • Create New...