Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Don't ever buy a brother printer


frash.exe

Recommended Posts

gah what a piece of fuging poo.

My father bought a Brother MFC 210 printer/copier/fax/toaster oven/whatever the hell else a few years ago. I guess the "MFC" stands for "motherfuging c*nt" because you'll exclaim that plenty when trying to use this machine.

what's wrong with it? where do i start? as soon as we got the damn thing the phantom paper jams were plentiful, 8 year long "cleaning" sessions are frequent, oh and by the way, when it cleans, it uses ink. is that fuging ridiculous or what? So even if you don't use it much, that son of a bitch will still swallow ink like there's no tomorrow. I was so pissed off one day i wrote a review about it on epinions.

I swear everytime I go up to the damn thing one of the 18 ink cartridges that are in there is out of ink, well, actually, the thing might be half-full, but the goddamn printer refuses to work if it doesn't have a new cartridge.

If I was the one that actually bought the thing I would've stuck it in the driveway and back my Impala right the fug over it. And with my crappy job, there's no budget for a new printer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You basically just highlighted most all printers you buy now. They are make cheap, very cheap. These places make their money off the ink now, not the hardware unfortunately. If you print quite often, getting 2 years out of a printer like this is good. They don't make them like they used too, I had a ink-ribbon printer a long time ago, and that thing was a beast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only good printer I've ever gotten was the most simple HP available in '97(no faxing/copying/etc, just prints) - it's still working fine.

well before we got this piece of crap we'd been using an HP inkjet we bought in 1994. The only reason we replaced it was because the resolution of images was really out of date by that time, it never had a hardware problem and would make do when it ran out of a certain color, but the technology was pretty much outstanding at the time we bought it. Also their cartridges were just a black ink one and a color ink one. That one color ink cartridge would last 3 or 4 times as long as the brother cartridges for the piece of garbage i use, or at least try to use.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have a couple of Dell printers that came with some systems we bought at the office and have been having trouble with the toner running out quickly. The inital batch of toner that came with them lasted forever, but now any new toner we buy is gone in a hurry...

I pretty much stick with HP printers and plotters and don't have too many issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

I swear everytime I go up to the damn thing one of the 18 ink cartridges that are in there is out of ink, well, actually, the thing might be half-full, but the goddamn printer refuses to work if it doesn't have a new cartridge.

This is why i wll never buy a brother again. When it thinks you are out of ink it stops working. From what I have read it does this when the toner is still half full. There are some tricks online like covering up certain holes with duct tape that will fool it for a while. But the toner life is really short...even when its not out of toner.

So i gotta go buy a toner carttridge. Big deal. The principal is Brother forces you to buy toner every so often whether you need it or not.

Oh yeah i am trying to print a report during busy season.

F U brother

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We use only HP at work and I only get HP at home. Ink cartridges are cheaper. At home, it's an inkjet-do-everything (wanted the copy feature) but all that HP wants running in the background was annoying. I uninstalled everything but the print driver. I can still scan through Scanners/Cameras in the control panel and it is so much easier.

One of our properties bought a brother some years ago that was supposed to do everything. Turns out it wouldn't scan to a pdf file which is death in our business. Part of my job is getting software/hardware working for 170 properties no matter what so I found a 3rd party program that allowed that brother to scan to pdf. When it stopped printing a year later, I had them throw it out.

Too bad you aren't in the Charlotte area. I have an old HP plain inkjet you could have. Check out your local Goodwill. They have older printers for $10 or less and you can find the drivers online. Just be sure to talk to them about returning it if it doesn't work.

And for God's sake, stay away from Lexmark. Worse than Brother. You'll need a 2nd/3rd job just to afford the toner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I understand the concerns--he is not P. Sewell or Joe Thomas.  He has technique issues and was not great in the run game and was good in pass protection when UGA did not pass much.  Then there is the immediate need vs long term need perspective.   I did not see Freeland being there-frankly. Here is why:   He has nearly 35" arms and his hands are large (10.5").  He ran a 4.93 40 at the combine.  He is very agile.  His vertical was 33.5".   Physically, he is a freak. He is 21 and he seems very intelligent (coachable). You have to remember, some of these rookies are 24, 25 years old. Freeling is A team player.  His shortcomings are fixable.  Short arms (as with the kids from Utah and Miami) are not fixable.  The Run on OTs began at #9: Fano (picked 10 picks earlier) has 32" arms and his hands are 9".  He did not play in the SEC like Freeling.  Many think the short arms project him to guard. Mauigoa (picked 10th) has 33" arms.  He is a solid player, but his arms make him borderline as a T (they seek 34" and up as ideal)  Kayden Proctor (picked 12th overall) struggled in pass protection and projects by many to RT or G.  Weight management is a concern. So it is possible that Freeling will be the first LT taken who actually plays LT.  (he also has the ability and experience to play RT)  His questions are fixable and not limited to physical limitations.  Here is the question:  If you know that you need a Tackle, and you could choose between all four of these players, who would you pick? I am not sure that Freeling would not be the player I selected if given the opportunity to take any of them.
    • The more I think about this pick the more I like it. The Icky injury might end up being a blessing in disguise for everyone except Icky unfortunately. If Freeling pans out at LT the Panthers have a good player on a rookie contract at a premium position at a time when they’re going to need to potentially pay Bryce for his next contract. Icky was likely going to command a big salary jump for his next contract and now, there’s a strong justification he’s not going to be worth a big money extension until he rehabs and proves he can still play at a high level. Since he’s finishing his rookie deal this season, it will be interesting to see if the Panthers bring him back for the 2027 season. Obviously it’s too early to say and they will probably wait to see how the season pans out with Moton still elite but aging and clearly battling persistent injuries, and they need to see if Freeling can develop into a starter during his rookie year. But ultimately this might have opened up a huge chunk of salary cap for the next 4-5 years. 
    • You read my mind Nastradamus! If Rodriguez is still there I feel like it will be hard to pass on him. And one of these TE we keep drafting have to hit eventually and Delp is just as good as the others.
×
×
  • Create New...