Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trouble at work


tarheelblue89

Recommended Posts

So it's my fourth year at a local water park where I am making less then most of the new people I work with. fuging new managers are idiots that ask me how to do everything. That poo had me pissed off to begin with but now I get my schedule today for June and I'm literally working 7 fuging days this month.

I'm not a guy who likes to make a big fuss out of something, but this has got me pretty fuging pissed.

Sorry to bug you with my 19-20 year old problems but I had to just vent for a second.

Also forgot to mention that these new managers are now working with us, so basically they are taking up schedule spots from the rest of us. And I guess I'm the odd one out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That could be a clue.

You should ask, respectfully and humbly. what you need to do to get more days.

hahaha. Only when I drink do I smoke, and only do I drink on special occasion. My birthday is on Sunday, so this is such an occasion. If they are giving me less money and less hours because I drink heavily or smoke every day, then they do not know who I am.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bring it up. If it doesn't improve, leave.

I suggest you find a better job anyways. If you aren't happy with your job, it's time to start moving on. Keep working, but apply for other jobs. A lot of HR people actually like seeing current employment on a resume, it shows initiative and drive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • OL then RB would make heads explode but its might not be too unlikely 
    • Wonder if we draft a RB. Seems like a lot of eggs in Brooks’ basket right now.  And the OL, no kidding. If that running game goes to hell with what we have at QB, you can forget competing. It is so much more important than sticking another wideout on the field. Take your wideout later. 
    • I have lots of different thoughts on it. This argument, the primary thing is I don’t like seeing him or anyone, being convicted on hearsay and/or pure speculation. Which some are doing.  I don’t care That much about defending Morgan as I do about the criticism being fair minded.    You sort of assert that Dan was just a yes man. I don’t think we know if he ever pushed back against Fitterer but I have this instinct thing that needs me to satisfy the question of: if Tepper was so down on a Fitterer as to fire him, why in the world would he hire his carbon copy? I guess maybe he wanted a yes man.Like I said, lots of different thoughts.     I am just not gonna judge him that harshly based only on speculation. I am sticking with what he has done starting when he was hired as GM. Maybe I am more lenient because the first season for him and Canales, I gave both a pass. Said I would judge them after the first year. Stuck to it. If you can get to the reality that neither were ready for the job and say okay give them a year get their feet wet, it looks a lot better.    And we are not bound to Bryce yet. Yes, for yet another fuging year he can probably marginally improve and slide by like he has been doing. But if they add even more people and he regresses? I think we could see some relief.    The QB room? As I understand it, Pickett was Canales’ choice. If we need to blame people for poo. In a sense, he is very Bryce like. So makes a good plug in. I get that a little bit. We still have the draft. If they do better than Jake Plummer or Hooker I’ll know they are trying.   
×
×
  • Create New...