Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Theory about the lockout


Zithers

Recommended Posts

The owners are actually locking players out because they are afraid of one man...

CAM NEWTON

Jerry Richardson is the leader on lockout negotiations because he wants to win some damn Lombardi Trophies. Everyone else is abandoning him though. The owners don't want to face the mighty Cam for the next 15 seasons. Since the media hates Carolina, none of this truth is actually being reported. Its all being swept under the rug and Jerry is made to look like a bad guy.

This is really the only plausible reason for the lockout lasting so long.

Discuss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The owners are actually locking players out because they are afraid of one man...

CAM NEWTON

Jerry Richardson is the leader on lockout negotiations because he wants to win some damn Lombardi Trophies. Everyone else is abandoning him though. The owners don't want to face the mighty Cam for the next 15 seasons. Since the media hates Carolina, none of this truth is actually being reported. Its all being swept under the rug and Jerry is made to look like a bad guy.

This is really the only plausible reason for the lockout lasting so long.

Discuss.

I lol'd

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Zithers, don't go back to the NFLB. There's nothing to talk about there except about how Matt Ryan can't win in the playoffs. :)

for once, that's the only thing you've ever said worthy of recognition.. I hear there is a food drive somewhere in the nation, wherever you are, feel free to participate...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Comparing a random stat to another rookie QB has nothing to do with the current subject.  Tom Brady had a 6.0 YPA his rookie year.  I hope you're not using one stat to define success of a QB? It's not a problem to want him to do better based on where he was drafted although I still contend it doesn't matter after the fact.  It doesn't matter if we're talking about Cam Newton, Tom Brady, Russel Wilson or any other QB.  It makes little difference once you're in the NFL.  Nobody gets a ring for where they were drafted.   Higher draft picks will get a little more time in most cases as teams want to make sure they've exhausted all avenues before they admit a draft pick can't play.  Other teams might pick them up thinking it wasn't the player but the organization and/or other coaches that caused the player not to succeed.  It's people's expectations that are wrong.  If we could go back and redo all the draft and put guys in the correct draft spot based on how well they played in the NFL, that would be nice.  Then your argument would make some sense.  People assume that where a player was drafted is a statement on how good that player is when the reality is there is a lot more luck than skill in drafting. If Coker turns into a pro bowl receiver and XL becomes a bust nobody cares except fans and the media. What we really should say is it's not too much to expect a player who has started at QB for a team over the last 2 years to be better than he currently shows.   Don't compare 1st round picks.  Compare starting QB's in the NFL.
    • They’re gonna have to go up against a real offense before any kind of judgement can be made of them.  Tlaw looks like damaged goods, Kyler is completely washed, and Penix….well…. they look better compared to last season but that’s what you’d expect with a healthy brown and horn.  I haven’t seen anything that indicates they’ll be considered an overall good defense when the dust has settled. 2002 it is not. 
×
×
  • Create New...