Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ryan Kalil Supporting Jake Delhomme


PantherBoy95

Recommended Posts

Never thought of this. I think it's a good idea, but only if he doesn't play... Sorry, I just don't think he's the second coming of a Kurt Warner. We'd prolly get him on the cheap as well. I know he loves this organization from top to bottom.

Edit: after letting it marinate for a couple minutes I think this is genius. He already has everyone's respect here... It's not like he'd be the fugin new guy, that when he talks, people will be like, why is this guy even opening his mouth? His work ethic was awesome and he will instantly gel with everybody. I can see him being in the mentoring role just because if the guy he is... I can't get his ginL press conference outta my head right now. The way he cried really got to me... Looking back, it's something we needed to do with his huge contract...

Man I think this would be a CLASSY move by Ron... I know the big cat loved him. He was over there at his house all the time. They had a great relationship.

Who started this thread? Instant swag! I think this would be a great move by the organization.

I am looking forward to those that disagree for various reasons that they will try to explain to me like I have no idea about his career...

I am 100% behind this move and really hope we do it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I for one would welcome Jake's presence as a mentor to Cam. Would be a nice bridge from the past to the future. I mean, if you consider what we're looking for in other veteran QB's - experienced, mentor-ready, high-character guy - then why wouldn't Jake be at the top of our list?

The only reason I can see for not wanting him back would be if you think the QB we sign will actually end up playing. I've never felt that way, so as far as I'm concerned bring Jake back. I've always loved the idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Never thought of this. I think it's a good idea, but only if he doesn't play... Sorry, I just don't think he's the second coming of a Kurt Warner. We'd prolly get him on the cheap as well. I know he loves this organization from top to bottom.

Edit: after letting it marinate for a couple minutes I think this is genius. He already has everyone's respect here... It's not like he'd be the fugin new guy, that when he talks, people will be like, why is this guy even opening his mouth? His work ethic was awesome and he will instantly gel with everybody. I can see him being in the mentoring role just because if the guy he is... I can't get his ginL press conference outta my head right now. The way he cried really got to me... Looking back, it's something we needed to do with his huge contract...

Man I think this would be a CLASSY move by Ron... I know the big cat loved him. He was over there at his house all the time. They had a great relationship.

Who started this thread? Instant swag! I think this would be a great move by the organization.

I am looking forward to those that disagree for various reasons that they will try to explain to me like I have no idea about his career...

I am 100% behind this move and really hope we do it!

Many here have said in the past that it's a waste of a roster spot on a guy you won't play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm going to be real, the reason that vote ended up so lop-sided by the end was directly due to my programming. So there's nothing tongue in cheek about it. Also I left PFF after the Collinsworth acquisition (didn't want to move to Cincy) but have stayed involved in analytics via backdoor channels, but I can absolutely say that the experience was eye-opening, not because those guys are unquestionable football savants and that I became one by proxy, but because the amount of information that becomes available outside of what the typical fan has access to is revelatory and also really drives home how much context is still being missed even with all of that information. You don't discover that you know everything, you discover how much you still can't know no matter how hard you try, hence my point about the NFL not being able to figure out what makes a QB good. There's a lot of AI work going into that now and even that only seems to further confuse things vs. actually enlighten the problem. In the professional realm teams don't really talk about quarterbacks as A strictly being better than B, but how A can potentially perform better than B given a specific context of C. Of course those contexts may be wider for A than B, but there's also contexts where B can outshine A, even with lesser talent surrounding them. So what good teams strive to do is ultimately define a process of how they want their entire team to operate under schematically, find players that fit that scheme, and hopefully find a guy whose skillset will be maximized running that scheme with those players. Where bad teams fall of the wagon is constantly shifting those schemes and chasing bad fits or fads vs. sticking with a core identity and developing it.
    • there is a 100 mile long list of NFL players and coaches going to bat and defending horrible play from teammates.   
    • In 6 games, we've only had 6 hurries??? ... that can't be accurate
×
×
  • Create New...