Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

WR FA Poll: Who's your preference?


davos

Recommended Posts

It seems like the talk around bringing in an established WR is growing...I figured we could get a poll. Who do you like the best?

*Don't change this to a Smitty thread.

I figured putting the prospects out on a list together could help.

One more thing to note: No one seems to be talking about Breaston, the Jones', & Lance Moore.

:cheers2:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no one. I like the potential of our young guys, and i'm pretty damn sure pilares is going to be a beast too.

The only problem with that is how many times have we done this? How many times have we said we don't need to bring in any big name FA wrs because we have "potential" at that position already. And how many times has it failed? I'd rather bring in some one that has been an established wr opposite of Steve Smith because let's face it Steve can't carry us like he used too he is getting older. That way our younger Wrs have another season to develop then if Steve leaves us next year Gettis and Lafell will be in better position to step up and be the Wrs of this team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think it was fear of the unknown because he tried to hide the extent of the injuries that made him drop. After the drop, the reports I heard were that teams knew what was wrong with his knee and it was something similar to another athlete from a few years ago (honestly don't remember if it was even a football player).  That it was basically one of those things where he should be fine for a while, there isn't a huge concern of immediate injury risk.   But what he has going on with his knee is something that is degenerative and there's little chance he'll be able to play more than 5 or so years on it before he won't be able to play anymore. So basically it was teams knowing if they draft him, he's probably going to be only a rookie contract player and even if he's great, you might not be able to get use out of him on a second contract.  Which in turn makes the drop make sense, but I'm kinda surprised some contending team didn't take him late in the 1st, hoping he'd put them over the top on a SB run but then not even have to worry about giving him a big contract in 4 years too.
    • Depends if they see the writing on the wall with their roster and contracts and decide to bite the bullet and begin a complete rebuild and roster overhaul.  I have no clue why some franchises (IE us) refuse to do this and keep half assing trying to win 8 games or so.  Do it correctly, take your lumps and build a contender.  We shall see what loomis decides.
    • Each team plays 17 games.  I do not see why they don't just have each team play one international game per year.  Neutral site game, 8 home, 8 away.    
×
×
  • Create New...