Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers need a vet QB but Bulger isn't the right fit


CatMan72

Recommended Posts

From the National Football Authority:

The Cam Newton era in Carolina is near, but until the first overall pick is ready to seize the starting job, the Panthers need a placeholder at quarterback.

Jimmy Clausen is not the answer after a horrific rookie season that featured an abysmal 58.4 passer rating.

Instead, the Panthers need to add a grizzled veteran quarterback.

One of the most accomplished veterans available is Marc Bulger, who spent last year as the backup in Baltimore after years as a starter in St. Louis.

But Bulger isn’t a great fit for Panthers. That’s in large part because he seems to prefer being on a good team, even as a backup, to starting for a bad team. Had he wanted to be a full-time starter in 2011, Bulger reportedly could have gotten a gig in Arizona.

The fact that Bulger apparently prefers to stay as a backup in Baltimore leads to questions about whether he is willing to take more lumps for a lower-tier team.

Read more: http://www.nationalfootballauthority.com/2011/07/panthers-need-veteran-qb-but-marc.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With all the changes, it's not like we are coming out winning anyway... Let Jimmy play.. see if he can make some improvement from last year. Let him try to hold the fort and be at least decent until Cam is ready. Maybe he shows value and can be moved later, or maybe a reliable #2 or backup in Carolina.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bulger may not have much of a choice and we might be the best option. That said he might not be the right fit for us. He is not much of a back up at this point and teaching and ridding pine is his best talents. We need someone to be able to step in if Cam is not ready cause Jimmy will never be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think you have to factor in that we're still not an attractive proposition for Head Coaches. You're not getting the cream of the crop if you fire Canales a year after winning the NFC South, especially considering the situation he walked into.
    • Yeah, I was about to say I hope he's doing okay health-wise because he's not looking good in that pic.
    • Honestly, I dont  think he should be on the hot seat yet. A bad start to next year, then yes. Despite our mistakes on play calling this past season, we played better than anticipated overall. Bryce showed improvement and maturity (although still not nowhere close to our expectations). Better record and 2-15 to 5-12 to 8-9. Despite what we feel the stats dont lie we are improving by 3 wins a year. Could 11-6 be our expectation. That's a high bar but at the rate we are going, thats what its looking like. We all want to see a 5-12 to a 13-4 record but we are methodically moving up. Success doesnt happen overnight (well in most cases).  IMO we are struggling mostly on the defensive end. LB and edge are our biggest weakness. I see Bryce making improvements (even though I was a Bryce hater) next year. Biggest concern is LT on offense. How to fix this? We need a big name edge or to trade up and get a big name edge or LB and pick up one in FA and draft one. Also if in the 3rd we can pick up a TE. Dont know if Sanders is the answer or Tremble (even though I love Trembles blocking and power after the catch). If these two can get their footwork together they would be great. Maybe all they need is a better TE coach. And if Brooks can stay healthy and be the back we thought he could be, man that would be great
×
×
  • Create New...