Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Charles Godfrey. Potential to be one of the best?


the212

Recommended Posts

In my opinion, the problem when evaluating Godfrey is the sub-par at best, and sometimes outright bad CB2 play. I'm not going to turn this into a trade for Asante Samuel thread or anything like that, but Richard Marshall was bad, and Captain could look even worse in his first year starting. Aside from getting literally ran over by Peyton Hillis last year on the goal line, I think he has been above-average in run support, and has been around the ball a lot in coverage. I just can't really form a solid opinion yet on him because he looks to be out of position too frequently, but again without watching actual game tape it's kind of hard to say if that was his fault, Marshall's fault, or somewhere in between. One good thing is that while Captain has been beat by bigger receivers, it's usually on jump balls and not outright getting burned so we should at least get a somewhat better glimpse of what Godfrey can do when he can focus solely on his own job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He is no Ed Reed, but more importantly I think he might be a good solid starter for us this year. We'll see he's had some dumbass play and has been the beneficiary of some really fortunate plays that lead to his interceptions. In fact what I don't like about Godfrey is that the past three seasons when I see him intercepting the ball it doesn't ever look like he is doing it because of great skill or great understanding of the play around him. Instead it looks like luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is hard to judge Godfrey in this system until we seem him play. I think he was below average in coverage in the cover 2. He always seemed to be late to the ball. He covered the run well, which shows me he can cover angles and get to the ball. I hope he shows better coverage skills in the new defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Panthers under a cover 2 have been more reactive v. aggressive. As a result, our corners and safeties have to maintain coverage longer. It will be a different story with a more attacking front line. I have always liked Godfrey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He makes some mistakes but a lot of his faults last year was covering Marshall's ass.

Was this ever definitively proven or is it just something we want to believe?

Cause I totally want to agree with this but I'm not sure it really can be heaped up on Marshall like that. Despite his substandard play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think he's gone, and rightfully so, if he turns in another losing record. The "talented roster," regardless of how true or not, is a double-edged sword. If the roster is so much improved now from 202X then why are you still producing losing seasons? On one hand, maybe that's what needs to happen. Have the GM hire the new coach, and then have the new coach pick his guy to run his system. That is typically how it works in the NFL. Not the forced inheritance deal we have had in place.
    • Hinging on Brooks to be our spark...be good if it happens... but not holding my breath....RB next draft. Morgan gambled...it would be a 2 year payoff if thing happened.
    • Only way Canales is fired is if we are attrocious everywhere....  defense /special teams and offense..  There are enough "questions" on if BY9 is the guy that ownership wouldn't fire the coach for "just" mid qb play.  Especially with as talented a roster that has played "well enough" to win some tough football games and hang in there against the top tier of the NFL ...(mostly).   Now total team suckage..yeah .. but I don't see that happening.   
×
×
  • Create New...