Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rewind back to April


stirs

Recommended Posts

mallett and hasselbeck would've been my dream come true, but i doubt we'd get lucky enough to get mallett that late. Say we pick up t.j. yates late and have hasselbeck lead our team then clausen and yates fight for the starting job in two years.

dareus dareus dareus, we don't need aj if gettis doesn't get injured

Link to comment
Share on other sites

mallett and hasselbeck would've been my dream come true, but i doubt we'd get lucky enough to get mallett that late. Say we pick up t.j. yates late and have hasselbeck lead our team then clausen and yates fight for the starting job in two years.

dareus dareus dareus, we don't need aj if gettis doesn't get injured

Why do you think us passing on Cam Newton would make Mallett get taken earlier?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think if you start two different rookie quarterbacks in back to back years you are just chasin' your tail. I think the team is headed down the same road as last year.

Hasselbeck would have been nice alone with a rookie (Dalton) and Jimmy.

Draft Green with the no. 1

the odds of duplicating Clausen's play is slim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

mallett and hasselbeck would've been my dream come true, but i doubt we'd get lucky enough to get mallett that late. Say we pick up t.j. yates late and have hasselbeck lead our team then clausen and yates fight for the starting job in two years.

dareus dareus dareus, we don't need aj if gettis doesn't get injured

Mallett is a head case and statue.......Hasselbeck is just about finished. That doesn't sound like dream scenario......sounds like we still would be looking for a QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The era that you played in, and, more importantly, who you played with actually matters. Honestly, that's why these issues will be debated forever, as it's just difficult to say that this person or that person is better when you're discussing the passage of time. As for me, after Rice, Moss and maybe Megatron and T.O., there's probably a dozen or so guys that can be argued about to the cows come home. Personally, I'm not putting Fitz, Harrison, Johnson, Evans, or especially D-Hop, Jefferson, Chase or Hill definitely in front of Smitty (and Colston ain't even in the discussion). Context and all that stuff actually matters. Things like the triple crown matter. 
    • Some of those guys? Yeah honestly you can.  I would 100% take Steve Smith over Larry Fitzgerald, Harrison, even Mike Evans. He is 100% a better player than those guys in his prime. If you look at the numbers Smith is historically under targeted in comparison to his contemporaries. He was only targeted 150 times or more only once in his career. Fitzgerald for example was targeted well above that 9 different seasons. Had Smith played with Peyton, Brady, Greatest Show on Turf, or even with Warner in Arizona he would broken records. His 2008 season was ridiculous accumulating 1400 yards in 13 games on less than 80 receptions. All time he also lost a season due to injury in 04, barely played WR as a rookie. Got robbed of 1k season with Clausen. Thats easily another 1800yds minimum that should have been tacked on to his #s. The only guys I’d say for certain are better than Smith are Rice, Moss, TO, Megatron, Julio Jones, Antonio Brown.
    • I parked in this lot a few times. It would take over and hour to get out of that lot after games. Never again
×
×
  • Create New...