Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Possible trade for CB Joselio Hanson?

1989

By 1989,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

1989 Experienced

1989

Posted
Posted

Per Carolinagrowl:

Possible trade for Joselio Hanson. RT @joncline2011: @carolinagrowl is there any CB u think panthers are looking at if no one gets cut.

Plays for the Eagles. Going into his 7th year- 4 career ints- decent pickup. I'ld Trade for a 6th rd pick for sure!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted

i hope so. he would be a great fit. as bad as the corners have been, our weakest link has been covering the guy in the slot. hanson is one of the best in that regard.

plus he's very familiar with the system and he shouldn't come to expensively, even if we had to trade for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted

Per Carolinagrowl:

Possible trade for Joselio Hanson. RT @joncline2011: @carolinagrowl is there any CB u think panthers are looking at if no one gets cut.

Plays for the Eagles. Going into his 7th year- 4 career ints- decent pickup. I'ld Trade for a 6th rd pick for sure!

i wouldn't be concerned w/ the lack of INTs. he pretty much shuts down the middle of the field.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ivan The Awesome Mentor

Ivan The Awesome

Posted
Posted

They have better CB's we can get and I'm not even talking about Samuel.

Brandon Hughes and Trevard Lindley. Both younger and maybe on the bubble, if they can't move Hanson, they'll have to cut 2 of them. More than likely one of them will mysteriously go on IR if that happens.

Nnamdi, DRC, Samuel, Marsh, Hughes or Lindley.

Hanson will be cut and Hughes or Lindley will too. So what would be more Ideal instead of giving the eagles something, would be for them to cut 2 of them and we are first on the waiver wire. I'd prefer lindley or Hughes over hanson either way.

Odd man out if they can't move

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      That's it. How do you feel about this draft class.

      By strato · Posted

      I was watching a YouTube and it was said that scout and GM insider types were saying the NIL had killed rounds 4-7. I don’t know that I buy it, seems like it might for a year or maybe two but then those guys have to move on.  NCAA is apparently about to give 5 years of eligibility. It is gonna skew those entrants older maybe.   
    • ForJimmy
      Panthers attempted to trade up with Ravens?

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • tukafan21
      Panthers attempted to trade up with Ravens?

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...