Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers 2012 Free Agents, Players Under Contract & Cap Space


R0CKnR0LLA

Recommended Posts

Unrestricted Free Agents

Jeremy Shockey, TE

Geoff Hangartner, OG

Dan Connor, MLB

Derek Anderson, QB

Legedu Naanee, WR

Antwan Applewhite, OLB

J.J. Jansen, LS

Jordan Senn, OLB

Gary Barnidge, TE

Mackenzy Bernadeau, OG

Richie Brockel, TE

Jerome Felton, FB

Cletis Gordon, DB

Reggie Wells, OG

Resign those in bold.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A couple questions.

1. This year they talked about a soft cap with actual spending higher. So does that mean the projected cap for next year may actually be lower than the actual cap.

2.We know that Davis has already said he will voluntarily restructure his deal so he will cost little to nothing. How much does that save?

3.Finally I imagine Hurney knew these numbers when he negotiated these contracts. I can't believe he hasn't already taken all of this into account and knows things we don't. So why all he worry about next June already?? I aalso figure he knew exactly what he was doing with Wiliams and had it all figured out.

4.As for free agents, how many of those big names have we picked up lately??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A couple questions.

1. This year they talked about a soft cap with actual spending higher. So does that mean the projected cap for next year may actually be lower than the actual cap.

2.We know that Davis has already said he will voluntarily restructure his deal so he will cost little to nothing. How much does that save?

3.Finally I imagine Hurney knew these numbers when he negotiated these contracts. I can't believe he hasn't already taken all of this into account and knows things we don't. So why all he worry about next June already?? I aalso figure he knew exactly what he was doing with Wiliams and had it all figured out.

4.As for free agents, how many of those big names have we picked up lately??

1. The 125 number is from the CBA document itself, it's the NFL and NFLPA estimate for next seasons cap number. The soft cap was a couple of loopholes included to allow teams to get under the cap. Cut moves, saving caps... ext Such as the 3 million cap exception.

This season teams can still save 3 million with an exception, it just can't be on one player. The cap savings has to be spread out over 3 players and can be pushed back one season.

2. His current cap number is 5.6 million, but that sky rockets up 8 million more because of his signing bonus that's automatic for still being on the team as of July 1st. Now if Davis has his deal restructured to be more incentive based and that's turned into a regular signing bonus or so forth. Then the team could cut his cap number from around 14 million to probably under 3-4 million.

3. I'm positive he knew those numbers and the plan is probably to extend Smith, Gross and Gambles contracts. Also the estimate of 125 could be low because of higher revenue, which isn't out of the question.

4. Not many that I can think of since the Lucas signing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thomas Davis' contract breakdown if we keep him without changing anything

2.25 million base salary

250K workout bonus

1.4 million from pro-rated signing bonus

2 million from pro-rated option bonus

Total: 5.9 million cap hit for 2012

I have a feeling if they restructure they will just remove the 8 million dollar option bonus and leave the rest in place. If so this would give us 2 million in extra cap space for 2012.

If they removed all bonuses, dropped his salary to the league minimum his cap hit would end up being $2,225,000, giving you an extra $3,675,000 in cap space. That would be the absolute maximum amount of space that could be created by a restructure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cam is still making a decent chunk of change but it's worlds better than what Bradford got just a year earlier.

yeah he's making what, like $4 million? high, but given what we're getting out of him it's, IMO, the best contract in the NFL value wise and it's not even close.

no one would be complaining if cam was making 80+ million.

true, but look at this

Mark Sanchez - $17,753,125

Matt Stafford - $16,098,750

Sam Bradford - $12,465,000

BTW Rocknrolla, while looking for those numbers I stumbled upon this:

“The Lions took that $9 million salary for this season, reduced it to the minimum for a third-year player ($525,000), then paid the difference ($8.475 million) as a bonus so it could be prorated for cap purposes, saving $6,356,250 of cap room,” the source said.

Who do we have that can restructure to save us money like this? I'm not sure what Gross/Gamble/Wharton's deals look like, but they're making an awful lot of money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, any team can restructure like that to create cap space for the current season. This is actually beneficial to the player too, as it makes their base salary fully guaranteed and they receive a big check up front instead of 16 game checks over the course of the season.

But this doesn't magically create cap space out of thin air, it simply pushes current cap hits onto future seasons and you have to deal with them then. I expect a few of these type of restructures to happen, though not too many as we already around 100M toward 2013 and 14.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, any team can restructure like that to create cap space for the current season. This is actually beneficial to the player too, as it makes their base salary fully guaranteed and they receive a big check up front instead of 16 game checks over the course of the season.

But this doesn't magically create cap space out of thin air, it simply pushes current cap hits onto next season and then you have to deal with them then.

if we can just keep holding off until that TV rights deal hits, we should be fine.

any ideas on what the cap will be when that hits?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No. Physical tools alone aren't enough. There are plenty of examples of draft busts to support that. Aost all of them had the physical tools and that wasn't enough. But Bryce is a perfect example of the opposite. Absolutely elite intangibles aren't enough either. If you simply don't have the physical abilities all the football intelligence and work ethic in the world won't be enough to overcome it. Just look to the sidelines every Sunday. We call those people "coaches".
    • As much as I despise Billy B, his philosophy on QBs is how I would approach things if I were a GM. You always keep looking for your next starter.  He has Bledsoe, who got injured and his backup ended up being the GOAT. Even while he had that going, he kept getting his next guy and developing them. When Brady got hurt, Cassel stepped in and went 11-5 and they missed the wild card by dumb luck. Who knows how far they would have gone if they had gotten in. Jimmy Gs career started in NE. There were others, but he always kept looking.  You can't be afraid to keep looking for your next starter, but it looks like we're afraid to look for more than a marginal one. If you're going to offer a $25m contract with incentives, that screams marginal QB. It also screams you're just a transition until we find our guy. After a 10 or 11 win season, he's not accepting that offer. And then you're in a Daniel Jones situation. Do you pay for a year of success and pray it wasn't a one year wonder?  To this point, Bryce has really produced nothing, yet for whatever reason, our FO has not even sniffed at the idea that we need a real QB room with real QBs. Dalton was never starter potential, Plummer was a joke. KP certainly isn't, neither is Grier.  Our approach to the QB room needs to be one of strength not fear. Bring in guys who can compete or who you think can compete. This is THE elite position, in an elite sport, paid premium salary, where production matters. Either you produce or you can lose your job. It's not mean, it's just the reality of the position.  And I'm really just tired of our candy ass approach to it. 
    • If you plug Bryce onto the Pro Bowl roster you might have a chance to compete for a SB. If he's surrounded by top tier talent with a top tier defense on the other side, a field flipping punter, and a kicker good from 60+ you might have a chance. But that means you basically have to recreate Saban's Bama in the NFL and that's impossible... and Bryce couldn't win a championship in that environment either. What the Panthers didn't realize when they got so obsessed with his "PG mentality" was that what they were looking st was a "barely checks the box PG". The basketball equivalent of Bryce would be an undersized PG with marginal athleticism who can make the basic plays but adds nothing to the team in terms of elevating the overall team. Not a great shooter, not a great defender, not a great driver. Just a guy who can basically get you into the offense and be a matador on defense. Basically a placeholder while you look to upgrade the PG position. 
×
×
  • Create New...