Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A scary stat for the offense...


firstdayfan

Recommended Posts

The offense has been nothing short of spectacular throughout the season. People complained that we weren't running the ball enough or effectively but I feel like that has changed a lot since the first two games. It seems like we finally have a balanced almost unstoppable offense here in Carolina, one that would make Steve Beuerlein, Patrick Jeffers, and Mushin Muhammed look like a high school squad. So why are we 2-6? Is it our swiss cheese run defense that allows opposing offenses to chew up the clock and keep Cam's towel on his head? Is it our horrid special teams which allows huge returns, misses chip shot field goals, and can't get figure out how to get the ball past the 30 yard line?

Actually I have another theory...one that actually involves the offense and their inability to score points. And there is one scary stat that makes this problem painfully obvious. The offense is ranked 5th in the NFL in terms of yardage with 415.1 yards per game, 5th in passing (285) and 8th in rushing (129). However, we are ranked 16th in scoring at just 23.4 points per game. How does this compare to the 99' offense you ask? In 1999 we averaged only 355 yards per game, 60 yards less, but averaged 26.3 points per game, over 3 points more and just in case you forgot that team went 8-8.

But hey, that was over a decade ago...how does our scoring compare to other high powered offenses today? The top 5 offenses average 31, 27, 25, and 34 points per game respectively...and then the Panthers at 23 points per game.

So why do we not score more points? Turnovers? Terrible starting field Position? 80 yard plus drives that eat up clock? Rookie QB? Whatever the reason its obvious that even though the defense is bad and the special teams is worse the offense needs to be more effective on the scoreboard. I guess the old adage is correct, you have to score more points than the other guys if you wanna win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't call this an average offense. I would call it a young offense. Average offenses don't put themselves in the redzone the amount of times Carolina has this year.

We have a rookie QB.....don't forget that. Redzone play always takes awhile to get down.

but don't sell short the fact Cam is getting us in the redzone more than any other QB in the NFL.....he is putting us in great situations. He is learning. Things are looking good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not a fluke that when Cam doesn't turn the ball over we win.

It's also not a fluke that we are one of the most penalized teams in the league.

It's also not a fluke that our competition in the first half was far superior to what most other teams have faced.

But..

Stay calm and carry on..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another rehash of a thread that has gone on ad nauseum. The offense in general is fine. But it dosn't operate in a vacuum. The statistics on how often a team scores is highly dependent on how long it has to drive the ball. Teams that start from their own 40 yard line for example are in field goal range after moving the ball 30 yards. This assumes your kicker can make a 40 yarder. Going from your 20. it would take 50 yards for a field goal try and 80 yards for a Td. Where are we in startiing field position? Near the bottom.

If we are at the top in 80 yard scoring drives we are obviously moving the ball but what people don't figure in is that if it takes 7 minutes to score the good news is that we kept the other offense off the field but if they then take 6 minutes to score on our defense, the first quarter is essentially over and we had one possession. So instead of rehashing the same old crap in the other thread lets at least give this a different spin. Those of you with access to advanced stats and the time to do it. How does our number of offensive possessions per game compare to other teams in the top five. Of thoose possessions, how many are 40 yards or less. How many are over 40 yards? Of those over 40, how many end up with punts, versus missed field goals or turnovers instead of points.

Instead of another tired discussion of points per yard which I really don't think is that informative, lets look at drives which is actually how the game is played and how scoring occurs. Or if you have new information not discussed, then do it here but lets not rehash the same old tired topic.

Thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not terribly surprising.

They're working on his short game, but Newton is still primarily a long ball QB at this point. That type is generally known to struggle in the red zone when things are shortened up. Opposing defenses know it and adjust accordingly. So far we haven't been able to effectively counter.

Once we improve either A) our run game or B) Newton's short game, then you'll see the scoring get better. It's not bad right now, mind you. Just not quite good enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not terribly surprising.

They're working on his short game, but Newton is still primarily a long ball QB at this point. That type is generally known to struggle in the red zone when things are shortened up. Opposing defenses know it and adjust accordingly. So far we haven't been able to effectively counter.

Once we improve either A) our run game or B) Newton's short game, then you'll see the scoring get better. It's not bad right now, mind you. Just not quite good enough.

TBH it seems to me we get inside the 20 almost every drive. Then it's penalty time. We have the most 1st and goal penalties in the league(don't have any stats to prove this, just seems like it).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

offense = points, not yards

we have an average offense

kinda depends. I think yardage is a reflection of how far we have to travel when we do get the ball. Points are a reflection of our entire team... not just our offense. The fewer "good" offensive opportunities, either generated through turnovers or good defensive stops, or through great special teams plays, the fewer points a team will often have even when it has a good offense relative to it's yardage totals. Obviously our offense isn't perfect, but I think things like "yards per point" undervalue field position.

No single stat is really perfect or tells the entire story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another rehash of a thread that has gone on ad nauseum. The offense in general is fine. But it dosn't operate in a vacuum. The statistics on how often a team scores is highly dependent on how long it has to drive the ball. Teams that start from their own 40 yard line for example are in field goal range after moving the ball 30 yards. This assumes your kicker can make a 40 yarder. Going from your 20. it would take 50 yards for a field goal try and 80 yards for a Td. Where are we in startiing field position? Near the bottom.

If we are at the top in 80 yard scoring drives we are obviously moving the ball but what people don't figure in is that if it takes 7 minutes to score the good news is that we kept the other offense off the field but if they then take 6 minutes to score on our defense, the first quarter is essentially over and we had one possession. So instead of rehashing the same old crap in the other thread lets at least give this a different spin. Those of you with access to advanced stats and the time to do it. How does our number of offensive possessions per game compare to other teams in the top five. Of thoose possessions, how many are 40 yards or less. How many are over 40 yards? Of those over 40, how many end up with punts, versus missed field goals or turnovers instead of points.

Thoughts?

We are 30th in number of possessions per game. Surprisingly, the teams below us are the Packers and San Diego. As you would expect, we have a far worse starting field position than those teams, coming in at 24th in the league. We also do well in points per drive, ranking 6th.

The only stat in which we are off on a per drive basis is interceptions, coming in at 24th.

Given that we are 29th in penalties per game and we have more offensive than defensive penalties, and given that we are 30th in number of possessions per game, I am certain we would come in last in number of penalties per drive.

So we need to work on the interceptions and cut down the penalties, and we should score with the best teams in the league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Boo, the formatting is being a pain in the ass and won't let me move the third video listed under "Q1 12:03 - 3rd & 10 from JAX 41" to under "Q3 04:25 - 3rd & 10 from JAX 14"
    • With there already being quite literally 10+ threads about Bryce I figured there might be a couple of posters that would be interested in talking about another poor performer in Jacksonville: the defense. Morgan made revamping the DL his primary focus this offseason in order to try and fix the historically bad performance that was put on the field last season only for the Jaguars to run for 200yds. With that performance, Evero's defenses in Carolina have now allowed 200+ rushing yards 26 times in 35 games. Even if Etienne's 71yd scamper doesn't happen he would have still averaged 4.8yds a carry.  So why is it all of the same, even with different bodies? I don't know yet. That's why we're doing this. 😛 Something that caught me off guard from Sunday's game was the Jags' success rate on 3rd down. I'm hopefully not the only one that felt like the Jags were converting on 3rd down at will, but after looking at the box score it appears that on 12 attempts they were only able to convert 5 times for a sub-50% conversion rate. How can that be? When Jacksonville needed a first down on third and long they seemed to get it. Wait a second... 3rd and long? Maybe that was why it felt the way that it did: the Jags were 3 for 6 on 3rd and 7+ to go. They were also 2 for 2 on 4th down. Those type of conversions are backbreakers for defenses, so let's take a look at those conversions to see if there's anything we can figure out. On one end, we have a situation where the defense is at an advantage and another where that revamped DL should be able to show it's value.   Q1 13:47 - 4th & 1 from JAX 37 This play felt like a taste of things to come. From their own 37yd line the Jaguars lined up with 2TEs and both WRs to the boundary side. Carolina is in their 3-4 base with a single high safety and showing an over front. It's worth mentioning here that the Jaguars aren't just lined up E-T-G-C-G-T-E... they're lined up T-T-G-C-G-E-E. The Jaguars send Dyami Brown in motion and run the jet sweep to the field side with the two TEs to the right moving out to the right while the rest of the line crashes to the left towards the boundary (and away from where Dyami is running). PJ2 is left unblocked and gets mixed by the fake handoff to the RB. Jaycee and Jackson do their best on the left side vs. the tight ends blocking them while Trevin is in pursuit from behind. Wallace had no idea the jet sweep was happening until it had already happened. He was cheating up and then went left afterwards. Great playcall and design by Coen here. If not for Jaycee knocking Brenton Strange backwards and tripping up Dyami, this might have gone for a lot more. 1A.mp4 1B.mp4   Q1 12:03 - 3rd & 10 from JAX 41 Right after giving up a 4th & 1 the defense gives up another conversion, this time on 3rd & 10. The Jags start come out in the shotgun with the receivers set up in a 2x2 and the RB to TLaw's left. Dyami Brown motions across the formation towards the right side of the field so that the Jags have trips to that side. The Panthers are playing off coverage and are in an over front with two safeties split deep. The ball is snapped aaaaaand... it's cover 3 zone. Panthers are in a dime look with a 3rd safety and Moehrig starts to carry Travis Hunter but doesn't pass him off to Nick Scott. This opens up the spot Moehrig left for Brenton Strange to settle in to catch the ball underneath. Turk Wharton had jumped offsides to start this play as well. Somebody clearly messed up on this play and I think it's Moehrig because I don't think the playcall meant for him to man up on Travis Hunter. The more we do these over the season, the more answers I imagine we'll find as we see repeats. 2a.mp4 2b.mp4 3b.mp4 Q3 04:25 - 3rd & 10 from JAX 14 This and the following offensive drive for the Jaguars effectively killed any chance at trying to catch the Jaguars at 20. Backed up on their own 14yd line on 3rd and long, Jacksonville marches out their 11 personnel while the Panthers have their dime personnel with a third safety. They show an even front and man alignment but with off coverage. Surprisingly, rather than cover-3 we get a cover-6 call. Nick Scott backpedals all of the way from the 26 to the 40 to be the deep half defender as Mike Jackson passes Dyami Brown off to him from the 24 (where the first down marker is). Jackson passed him off because Brenton Strange was coming open underneath to the flat. As soon as TLaw sees the pass off he fires it over to Brown who makes the comfortable catch. Mike Jackson immediately tackles him as Nick Scott hustles over from 10yds away from the play. I think the clear issue here was Scott getting so damn deep. The LOS is the 14, first down at the 24, and he's all the way back at the 40? 3a.mp4   Q4 10:44 - 4th & 1 from CAR 34 The Jags line up with both tight ends inline to the boundary (left) side along with OL6. Nothing fancy here, just a HB dive.  BB3 showed good get off here but the center for JAX did a good job bumping him and climbing to the second level to seal off Moehrig. DB got pushed back a little bit by the LT after bumping into BB3 and the RG did his job in sealing ARob off enough. The Jags won in the trenches... not much else to say here. Moehrig could have started coming downhill a little sooner to try and shoot the gap, maybe? Other than that, ARob winning his match up could've prevented it? Regardless, this sucked because it gave the Jags another set of downs to run the clock down with... you know what? Moehrig should've shot that gap. It's 4th & 1 in the fourth quarter and there's enough time to get two or three possessions. He's opposite of the tight ends and Mike Jackson has 1-on-1 coverage on the outside. Moehrig has to go downhill here. 4a.mp4 4b.mp4 Q4 09:16 - 3rd & 8 from CAR 29 And just like the drive to start the game, the Jaguars end the 3rd quarter and start the 4th with a drive where they convert on 4th & 1 and then 3rd and long on the next set of downs with a long drive that ended in a field goal. Jags are in 11 personnel while the Panthers are in nickel with Scourton + Johnson as the EDGEs. Bunch to the right and who wants to guess the play call by Evero? If you guess cover 3, you win! Coen did, and the Jaguars were able to let Brenton Strange settle in right between Rozeboom + Moehrig for a 10yd gain on 3rd & 8 to keep the chains moving. 5a.mp4 5b.mp4 The conversion rate on 3rd & 7 - 10 in the NFL is 34.42%. Not only did the Jaguars convert half of their 3rd and longs, they also had two drives where they converted not only a 3rd and long a 4th down as well. Their first drive to start the game, a 13 play, 55yd drive that took 6:45 off of the clock (and netted them 3pts) and their third to last drive of the game. That later drive was a killer: 15 plays, 49yds, 8:07 possession time. Those two drives alone drained a total of 14:5, an entire quarter, off of the game clock. They only came out of both drives with field goals, but that's still just not going to be good enough results by the defense help this team win games. Evero's scheme works when the team is ahead and teams have to throw the ball more. In a dirty slugfest though? It's not holding up well at all. Combine that with the Panthers' offense starting slow yet again and this might not get better until the team starts playing more complimentary football. It's only week 1 though and there's a lot of football left to go in the season.
×
×
  • Create New...