Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What were most of the looks the Titans had on D?


pstall

Recommended Posts

I only saw bits and pieces while on the coast.

From a cursory browse of the play by play I noticed some quick stuff.

Multiple sacks on 1st down.

Lots of incompletes to the left side.

Lots of 3 and outs.

First 3 passes to Smitty was like 1,2 and 2 yards.

Just curious as to what most of thier looks were? Because they did an OUTSTANDING job on not allowing Cam to get any type of rhythm or confidence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They blitz on running downs and sent 3 on passing downs. When they blitzed the pressure, got there pretty fast, and when they only sent 3 the pressure was still pretty constant, with a lot of people in coverage.

I think they took away Smitty and the TE's and dared us to beat them with our Number 2 receiver.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TBH I think a lot of it was Cam being a Rookie and not knowing that the CB/DB was coming. It was multiple Blitzes from the right side that Cam likes to run too and just down right good pressure on the oline. Bell was outmatched all day and Chud made no adjustments. Not only did they use Cams weakness but also Chuds because they knew he would give up on the run when they were down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Titans didn't blitz much really. The pressure came from 4 up front just beating the crap out of our front.

They did on first down but after that they didnt have too because it was 2nd and a mile. But to say they didnt blitz much on first down would be incorrect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

blitzed on 1st down, while Chud kept calling deep passes (with Smitty jogging a few yards down field and then standing in place), leaving Legedu to take on the entire secondary...

Cam couldn't scramble because Byron Bell gave every Titans defensive player an invitation and directions to Cam in the backfield.

Titans ran a lot of nickel packages (not the 3-4 that's been mentioned here) They blitzed the nickel several times since our gameplan only called for our #2 WR and bad-day-to-have-a-bad-day TE to get the ball.

All in all, the Muppets could have played D and won.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...