Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Report: LaFell to move to #2 WR spot vs. Colts


holycrikey

Recommended Posts

I watched the majority of his LSU games & researched him coming out. Draftniks, etc. also spoke about his blocking skills. It was clear the blcoking phase of the game was important for WRs according to Fox, b/c pointed out the importance of that phase of the game for WRs on multiple occasions. I had a feeling back then we would draft him d/t his blocking, since Fox was our coach. I didn't say he was a good blocker b/c Fox said so.

Again, that was college. What has he done in the NFL? The only time he has got significant playing time, the Panthers could not run the ball at all. I like Lafell and think he can be a solid #2 player. But I don't want to hear what he did in college or middle school. Naanee has actually been the Panthers best blocking WR this year. I dare you to find any Panthers player or coach who would say otherwise. That said, he isn't the future and should be the 3rd WR at best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no your not. it just aggravated me that you questioned my post with your OPINION when it clearly stated that it was a direct quote from rivera

Lol.

"how dare you question my post? Don't you know who I am? You keep your facts away from my post from now on okay, or I'll change my argument again and try to make you look silly!!"

If you post something incorrect, I have every right to correct it. You aren't on a pedestal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again, that was college. What has he done in the NFL? The only time he has got significant playing time, the Panthers could not run the ball at all. I like Lafell and think he can be a solid #2 player. But I don't want to hear what he did in college or middle school. Naanee has actually been the Panthers best blocking WR this year. I dare you to find any Panthers player or coach who would say otherwise. That said, he isn't the future and should be the 3rd WR at best.

What exactly makes u think he's been the best blocking WR we have?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again, that was college. What has he done in the NFL? The only time he has got significant playing time, the Panthers could not run the ball at all. I like Lafell and think he can be a solid #2 player. But I don't want to hear what he did in college or middle school. Naanee has actually been the Panthers best blocking WR this year. I dare you to find any Panthers player or coach who would say otherwise. That said, he isn't the future and should be the 3rd WR at best.

431418500.gif

He also had a strong block on Cam's TD run.

LaFell is doing well for a second year player, in both facets. Naanee is definitely the best blocker, but the offense loses a threat at the position. Some will want a blocker like Naanee in there to help out the run game. I'd give up some blocking ability in the run game to put a better receiver on the field.

Naanee doesn't warrant having safety help over the top and allows defenses to key in on Smith and the tight ends. One dimensional players also make it really easy for teams to find tendencies based on substitutions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lol.

"how dare you question my post? Don't you know who I am? You keep your facts away from my post from now on okay, or I'll change my argument again and try to make you look silly!!"

If you post something incorrect, I have every right to correct it. You aren't on a pedestool.

lol your a fuggin idiot.. you weren't correcting chit. I'm tired of trying to explain it to you. IT WAS A DIRECT QUOTE FROM RIVERA. HOW DO YOU CORRECT THAT!? YOUR OPINION MEANS NOTHING. AN OPINION THAT'S WHAT YOU GAVE.. NOT A FACT BUT AN OPINION. once you get that through your little brain then the sooner you would stfu.. child please

so I'm pretty sure I'm the one getting trolled. Get a life you immature idiotic fug

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just because he said that he like's Naanee's blocking does not mean that he is playing him because of his blocking, nor that he is the best blocking WR on the team. You're drawing your own conclusions from the quote you posted earlier.

He's already made it pretty clear his opinion is superior to yours, mine and everyone elses. Go ahead and stick him on ignore and be done with it. You are correct though, nothing Rivera said in that quote he listed would indicate that Legs is the premier blocker whats-his-face is making him out to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol your a fuggin idiot.. you weren't correcting chit. I'm tired of trying to explain it to you. IT WAS A DIRECT QUOTE FROM RIVERA. HOW DO YOU CORRECT THAT!? YOUR OPINION MEANS NOTHING. AN OPINION THAT'S WHAT YOU GAVE.. NOT A FACT BUT AN OPINION. once you get that through your little brain then the sooner you would stfu.. child please

so I'm pretty sure I'm the one getting trolled. Get a life you immature idiotic fug

FWIW, that kind of response is a troll response regardless of who is right or wrong. Trolling by personal attacks usually gets you warned and then banned. You could easily make the point without the fuggin idiot and STFU comments.

Just sayin.....................

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rivera straight out said the reason Naanee was 2nd was because of his familiarity with the offense. He has also given praise to his blocking, but the reason he was starting was likely more the fact he was helping the offense get lined up... kinda important given our situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Rumors are the team is in fact done with Ikem. So it was going to be a LT, just depended on which one got to them at 19. 
    • I have not read the entire thread, and I realize this is fluff to a degree, but it was recorded in real time.  Here are 10 things that stood out to me: 1. Morgan wrote down (before day 3) the first three day 3 picks.  (Lee, Hecht, and Wheatley).  I was never fond of the Morgan hiring as GM.  I thought he was a lazy selection and I questioned his ability to match wits with some of the best GMs in the NFL.  Not any more. Morgan OWNED this draft.  He knew which players were good fits and when they would be bargains, and he got bargains.  I am thoroughly excited about every player. 2. Canales said (about Hecht, a 5th rounder):  "He has a real chance to start."   Morgan said the same thing about Freeling. While I do not expect either to start day 1, it looks to me like we drafted 40% of our starting OL in 2026.  I think we will sign Ickey to a deal and play him at RG, allowing us to escape the Robert Hunt contract in 2027.  Of course that is conditional, and Ickey could replace Moton instead, but if he fully recovers, we are looking at a better RG/RT than he was a LT--which was average.  3. When Morgan said to second-round DT Hunter, "Ready to play beside Derrick Brown?"  Based on personalities, one calm and soft spoken (for the Most part, Brown is) and the other talkative and openly enthusiastic, it reminded me of Brentson Buckner and Kris Jenkins.   4.  Perhaps the steal of the draft was Tennessee WR Chris Brazzell II.  Clearly the Panthers felt that they passed on him when they took Hunter in round 2.  They mentioned his skill set (able to attack on "all three levels.")  This sent me back to watching film. He has speed, hands, and he produced without a great QB. I think he could be great in the NFL.  When  5. Tepper was a bit more involved than I would like, but he seems to be very confident in Morgan.  If I were the owner, I would be doing the same thing.  Canales was also somewhat of a background character--everyone understood his role and stayed in his lane.   6.  I am also very interested in the quantitative analytics aspect of the draft room.  (something like, "He has a 94% chance of being there at pick 55, and a 38% chance of being there at 87). I would like to know their formula, because it seemed to be spot on. 7.  BPA?  Not really.  They had a shopping list and seemed to be targeting the players they selected. I realize other players were edited out, but I was impressed how they knew, by round, who they wanted and if there were multiple options sitting there, they traded back. 8.  Evero (I think) called Lee a candidate that would serve as the "#3 CB."  Morgan describes his size as a plus (Long). Strong praise for a 4th rounder.  If so, we have Thornton coming off injury who played well as an UDFA rookie and they will battle it out to become Jackson's replacement after the 2026 season, assuming the Panthers do not extend him (he turns 30 in 7 months.O 9.  I think we could realistically see every one of these draft picks play this season, and I believe most could start by next year--Realistically, Freeling, Hunter, Hecht, and Brazzell could all be starting or key rotational pieces this year.  I see Lee and Wheatley getting special teams reps and both could be used this season more than expected.   10.  Kuwatch seemed to be predetermined with the final pick, probably because he can add something special to special teams.   He and Bam Martin Scott will fight it out for the 4th ILB position, so it will probably come down to special teams--and Kuwatch stands out there.  Imagine an ILB with a 46.5 vertical (not a typo) on the FG block team.  Kuwatch has an 8.85 RAS score vs. Martin-Scott's 7.5.  
    • They did mention Bain as the pick if he fell but didnt seem confident that would be the case. 
×
×
  • Create New...