Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam's day


Dpantherman

Recommended Posts

So you watch our defense and you think it's good?

Can I come watch the game with you? (and smoke some of whatever you're smoking)

BTW, our defensive coordinator disagrees with you...

After last week's meltdown against Detroit, which overcame a 17-point deficit to win 49-35, McDermott thought his defense needed a confidence shot. In addition to the video, McDermott gave an impassioned speech and encouraged his players to believe in themselves.

"We were ready to go (Saturday) night," linebacker Dan Connor said of McDermott's talk. "It was (about) the defense has to start pulling our weight. We want to be on the same level our offense is on. That's what it came down. We came out fired up."

Read more: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2011/11/27/2809160/panthers-pick-off-colts-win-27.html#ixzz1f5pNTw9Y

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why don't you go figure it out? It's easy.

377/27 =13.97 Above average. Efficient. Which is roughly 15.4. So was our defense. For the same reason. Our offense was efficient.

323/19 = 17.0 Below average. Inefficient.

So a lot better than the Colts.

Let's just keep the post to this and call it a week :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alright I'm still confused as to what our friend PFFL actually believes, so can you please go on record for a moment and answer a few questions?

Question 1: Which NFL team has the best defense, and what makes them the best?

Question 2: How much do you think defense matters at all when it comes to winning games?

Question 3: Why doesn't any analyst on TV or radio agree with you? Why do GMs spend so much money on their defense when YPP is an offensive stat and YPP is all that matters?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why don't you go figure it out? It's easy.

377/27 =13.97 Above average. Efficient. Which is roughly 15.4. So was our defense. For the same reason. Our offense was efficient.

323/19 = 17.0 Below average. Inefficient.

So a lot better than the Colts. Our team's total scoring offense was more efficient against the Colts. They were not. (Painter threw a pick in the red-zone at the end of the game which affected it most among other stupid things). We won. Works out just like all 99% of NFL games work. Works just about every time. The more efficient offense wins the game.

And here's the questions that actually really matter when in the right context: Losing and winning.

How many of our games have we won when we were the more efficient total offense? 3

How many have we lost when we were not the most efficient total offense? 7

How many have we lost when we were the more efficient total offense? 1

Which game was it that we should have won and our total offense was more efficient in scoring? Was our defense also better than our opponents in yards per points allowed? Why did that happen?

Why is this stat so fuging good at winning and losing and explaining things as well as pin pointing blame? And why am I the only person on the Huddle that knows this, knows what it means and knows how to read it when every other smart sports fan in the world understands it?

Good God, you've morphed again.

How many gmail accounts can one human being own?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting. And why is it that you think those teams have a good defense and why are half of those teams not in the playoffs?

There is a plethora of reasons why those teams have good defenses. I don't use just one stat as a catch all for offense and defense. It is a variety of different stats and usually from their "per possession" stats. The reason why half are not in the playoffs is because their offenses are not very good. The ones that have closer to average offenses (Cincy, Balt, NYJ) do have winning records.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am high, but that’s besides the point! The blue line is not good right now. I’ve said it all year. I don’t think this group meshes well. Slaven has been just OK Niki up and down Miller up and down ghost and Walker have been your most consistent guys. Maybe it comes together more towards the playoffs
    • I was expecting to see more cap room moves by now, which may be to suggest that we are not going to be that aggressive.  I have mixed emotions about that (because I think we have 3 needs on D and 3 needs on O--starters).  If you look to the draft for 3 starters, that is ambitious.  We need 6
    • Yeah we shouldn’t be competing with teams, bidding wise, to sign a WR. There will be one for us and our budget.  I keep saying, how many balls will there be to go around anyway? One thing good I will say for this offense is the ball has been spread around at times. Seems like I remember seeing a large number of guys have caught passes in a game. Or been targeted at least. 3 RBs 4 or 5 WRs 2-3 TEs type of stat lines. 10-11 guys.  Not every week but that happens.    As far as WR in general, we need the smaller agile and quicker component to compliment what is there. After that it should be about depth, having good backups for the starters so we can run things consistently still, if a guy is out for a week or two. That is especially important in game where you have to finish the game with who you made active. 
×
×
  • Create New...