Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Broncos stat that everyone will ignore...


Dpantherman

Recommended Posts

i would argue that it is easy to give up only 12 points per game when you can run it 40 times.

But if you run it 40 times a game, its a lot harder to score more than 12-13 points a game these days. So if we were doing that, we would be losing games 13-10 instead of 30-27.

Although with our defense, I can't see us holding anyone to 10 points except in a Monsoon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last 5 games the Broncos have given up scores of 15, 10, 10, 13, and 13 respectively.

Easy to run it 40 times when you give up 12 points a week.

agree, though The Golden Calf of Bristol is part of that... he doesn't turn the ball over

i would argue that it is easy to give up only 12 points per game when you can run it 40 times.

perfect-storm.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's only going to be ignored because it's a quarterback driven league, for better or for worse. We refer to teams by their QB's and the nature of the game has definitively turned to PROTECT just them.

So when the Pats win a game, we say that Brady won it. Shouldn't expect it to be any different for The Golden Calf of Bristol. Ironically, if The Golden Calf of Bristol is anything truly like the veneer he puts on, he'd probably agree with you guys that he gets too much credit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • I simply acknowledge BY is the QB.  And just like we did when we drafted him.....the type O you would need to setup around him for success was always pretty simple.  But we have done virtually the opposite.  XL dropping some passes isn't why we were ranked the 32nd O and 30th passing the past 2 years.  *Ricky Prohel was brought up only in regards to role function he served on the team.  Niche/specialist.   He wasn't eating up the snaps in the O.    AT should have a similar snap %. People could MAUL Ricky Prohel and put hands all over him.   We got to the Super Bowl in part because we were mauling guys (our slot CB).   You can't do that now.  AT has a MUCH easier life and still can't get open.  Or run.    If you live in 3 WR sets, with a weak armed QB, and you choose to put someone who can't get open or run in the slot.......well, your are going to have a weak pass O.  That's by design IMO.  
    • Thielen's yards per reception was higher last year than any of Renfrows career.  His per game productivity last year as an old slow receiver the same as Renfrows 1 good season. These things are easy to find. 
    • With 1 more game but yeah hopefully Canales is better, obviously Rhule sucked. Better than Reich though and jury out on DC. Of course Wilks’ interim stint was the best we’ve had since 2017 but I give Tepper zero credit for that
×
×
  • Create New...