Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

QB Rating for Week 13

cookinbrak

By cookinbrak,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

cookinbrak Grand Master

cookinbrak

Posted
Posted

http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcsouth/tag/_/name/2011-week-13-total-qbr

Newton’s Total QBR was 91.7. That was even higher than Drew Brees, who usually tops the division’s quarterbacks. Brees’ Total QBR was 84.7, good for fourth in the league. But Newton ranked third behind only Tom Brady (93.6) and Aaron Rodgers (92.4). The scores also included the Thursday night game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ruff Newbie

Ruff

Posted
Posted

wtf is the point of the Total QBR? It's irrelevant. The QB Rating has been used league wide for years now, and it's an accepted form of statistics... Then there's this, which seems like ESPN can generate a random number, and people believe it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheRealDeal Newbie

TheRealDeal

Posted
Posted

wtf is the point of the Total QBR? It's irrelevant. The QB Rating has been used league wide for years now, and it's an accepted form of statistics... Then there's this, which seems like ESPN can generate a random number, and people believe it.

The problem was, it wasn't an accepted form of statistics.

It's pretty close between them. Imagine that in only his rookie season he is practically the same quality passer as a five year veteran stud like Matt Moore is ...then add in his rushing yards and TD's

wow.

Too bad this does account for rushing and TDs...but carry on being uninformed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • d-dave
      Experience with Electric Vehicles?

      By d-dave · Posted

      Most EVs are in the 90+ e-MPG meaning some measurement house somewhere compares the EV to a similar ICE model and works out how much is costs to charge (on average) versus fill up as a point of comparison. Talking long term, in the hundreds of thousands of miles?  No clue.  Some early signs are that EV batteries maintain 80% charge over 400k miles.  So there's that.   The challenge and charm of an ICE vehicle is being able to park it under a tree, get your jack stands out and tinker with your engine.  There's just not that same level of complexity in an EV.  I saw someone estimate there are 200 or so moving parts in an EV, and 2000 in an ICE vehicle.  I'm not a part counter so I can't really speak to that. I think that the EV is more the future than any type of combustion engine.  Those will still be around in specific purposes, but for most people - an EV will be the superior option in terms of efficiency.  I say that as someone who loves stupid horsepower numbers out of turbo 4 bangers and inline 6s...  I am one of those tinkers when I can be. A bigger issue for EVs is going to be the ownership versus lease.  Right now, there are INSANE leases on EVs, which is great, but what do you have at the end of that lease?  Nada, maybe some equity if you're lucky.  Where as I'm almost done paying for my car, and plan to keep it until the wheels fall off (or my son wrecks it when he starts to drive).  Will EV makers do the smartphone thing and build in planned obsolesce?  Stop updating software?  I love the tech in EVs, and I think getting more cars and trucks off the road is a good thing.  But I am still just a little concerned.  Capitalism has gotten far too extractive.  
    • Jmac
      Quick FYI

      By Jmac · Posted

      ☝️👍
    • hepcat
      Official Panthers roster cuts thread

      By hepcat · Posted

      Blacksheer's time was up when they drafted Etienne. 
×
×
  • Create New...