Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

'19 Kids and Counting' Mother Has Miscarriage

jasonluckydog

By jasonluckydog,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

jasonluckydog Veteran

jasonluckydog

Posted
Posted

Michelle Duggar, who stars on the TLC reality show, announced that she was expecting her 20th child in November.

Michelle Duggar, who stars of TLC’s reality show 19 Kids and Counting, has suffered a miscarriage after announcing she was expecting her 20th child.

'19 Kids and Counting' Mom Michelle Duggar Expecting 20th Child (Video)

Michelle’s husband, Jim Bob, said in a statement that he and his wife were told at a doctor's appointment Thursday that she had miscarried. He asked for privacy and said that Michelle was resting at home.

Duggar is the matriarch of the oversized family that has starred on the TLC show since 2008.

My gf makes me watch this show and now I'm hooked feel bad for them if anybody should have a lot of kids it's this family

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/19-kids-counting-mother-mom-miscarriage-271556

Link to comment
Share on other sites
charlotte49er Newbie

charlotte49er

Posted
Posted

Maybe its because shes freakin 45 years old and trying to pop out a 20th kid after being cut into and delivering 19 other kids. Give it a rest. Look at it as a sign from God.

Quit procreating.

Not that I ever would want a woman to miscarriage, (My Mom went through several times trying to conceive me.) I was thinking the same thing. This it's God's way to telling you enough is enough already!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CRA
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By CRA · Posted

      This is about getting open and YAC....and the QB we have.  You basically are just highlighting average depth when targeted vs 2 players. .  And yeah, I often say AT is a small slow reliable TE in terms of what he does for us.   That's what he is.   I think a couple of you want to make this into a Renfrow argument.   I'm a Renfrow fan.  Renfrow does not check the box of what a BY O needs either at the slot.  Renfrow just a niche roleplayer at this level.  it's easy to look up how horrific AT is with the ball in his hands and in terms of getting open.....and it's also easy to look up what a low ceiling of an offense the steady AT diet produces w/ BY. 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Panthers' content round up

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      The one time he's actively tried to lose was the best we've ever done.
    • CRA
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By CRA · Posted

      I simply acknowledge BY is the QB.  And just like we did when we drafted him.....the type O you would need to setup around him for success was always pretty simple.  But we have done virtually the opposite.  XL dropping some passes isn't why we were ranked the 32nd O and 30th passing the past 2 years.  *Ricky Prohel was brought up only in regards to role function he served on the team.  Niche/specialist.   He wasn't eating up the snaps in the O.    AT should have a similar snap %. People could MAUL Ricky Prohel and put hands all over him.   We got to the Super Bowl in part because we were mauling guys (our slot CB).   You can't do that now.  AT has a MUCH easier life and still can't get open.  Or run.    If you live in 3 WR sets, with a weak armed QB, and you choose to put someone who can't get open or run in the slot.......well, your are going to have a weak pass O.  That's by design IMO.  
×
×
  • Create New...