Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Charles Johnson - doubtful


CRA

Recommended Posts

well, let's face it.....we pretty much have nothing to throw at Brees if he plays 4 quarters. If Johnson doesn't play.....it seems like it will be tough for the offense to match points in the dome. Should be an exciting game but upset looks tough if they play for 4 q.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

our only hope is Thomas Kieser and Shirley have the type performances/moments you only see play out in a movie.......

but I am excited to see the Stanford kid get more reps. Game pretty much is the ideal audition for the defense and who stays next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel we could generate enough pressure from somewhere. It's stopping Graham that's the problem. Couple that with the fact Godfrey is the only person that has even a smidgen of success covering him means a lot of 3 high defenses. The high is gonna be Pugh or Martin. It's depressing when you think about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel we could generate enough pressure from somewhere. It's stopping Graham that's the problem. Couple that with the fact Godfrey is the only person that has even a smidgen of success covering him means a lot of 3 high defenses. The high is gonna be Pugh or Martin. It's depressing when you think about it.

We have no answer for him. McDerp had better have some sort of plan in place this time. Last time around Graham ran wild and everyone knew they would go to him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I originally hated the Miller deal but with the cap projected to rise nearly $10M next season the Canes struck some pretty good deals between Miller and Ehlers. Most of the team is locked in for the next few years. Nikishin will need an extension probably in the $6M AAV range. And Blake will need one if we don’t move him. Personally I’d move Blake, picks, and any prospect not named Nikishin/Nadeau/Artamonov for McTavish as I don’t see any any of the big time players moving teams next year. Realistically the Hurricanes should just target Gustavsson next year to fix the goal tending issue. But I’m all for moving Blake, picks, and prospects for McTavish this year. Ehlers - Aho - Jarvis Svechnikov - McTavish - Stankoven Martinook - Staal - Carrier Hall - Kotkaniemi - Robinson Jost - Jankowski Slavin - Miller Nikishin - Chatfield Gostisbehere - Walker Reilly Andersen Kochetkov I’d do Blake, Felix-Unger-Sorum, and 27 2nd for McTavish.
    • Very true on the length but stuff like this is never where we shine. We aren’t a good team at drafting.
    • Homerism aside, the more I see from Dan, the more impressed I am.  His player evaluation instincts. Last year his 2 premier FA signings, Hunt and Lewis COMPLETELY changed the line and I have a feeling his success in choosing blue chip guys will continue.  Look at the panthers’s rep for FA signings in the past. By and large, it’s been guys 1 year past their prime who had an injury and suckered our GM in to a crippling contract. We never get nice things. When was the last time this team signed 2 young blue chip studs  in the same offseason to contracts worthy of their impact? Ever?  Im telling y’all, players respect and trust Morgan. 
×
×
  • Create New...