Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

SO what could we get if we trade down?


section543

Recommended Posts

For a team with multiple holes, picking up extra picks would be great. This is even more attractive seeing as how we are out of the top 5-6 picks where the blue chippers reside.

Moving from 9 to mid teens would be better in my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I could see the Bengals trading their 17 and their 2nd rounder to move up to take Richardson. I think it makes a lot of sense for both teams and i'd do it in a heart beat.

If they want a runningback I would trade Dwill straight up for the 17th. No way they would take on that contract though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Folks its not just "lets trade down"

IF it happens, its going to have to be on trade day, and it all depends on who is still on the board. Considering there are really only 2 guaranteed first round QBs that makes it even more difficult. Maybe a receiver? We don't know. It's so early that its really difficult to tell

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Bwood15

An interesting trade partner would be the Arizona cardinals at 13 or the Bengals at 17. I think it be a great move to move back into the teens, pick up Best DT, CB, or OL available and also gain a pick in the 3rd round or so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Bengals can probably get Richardson at 17 without moving. But, if for some reason the Bengals wanted to switch pick 17 for our pick at 8, then we should be able to get another second rounder. don't see it happening, but it would be wonderful for them to move up in front of Miami to get Richardson.

If I were them, I would offer the second first rounder for Stewart. Use their first one on a CB or something

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think it was fear of the unknown because he tried to hide the extent of the injuries that made him drop. After the drop, the reports I heard were that teams knew what was wrong with his knee and it was something similar to another athlete from a few years ago (honestly don't remember if it was even a football player).  That it was basically one of those things where he should be fine for a while, there isn't a huge concern of immediate injury risk.   But what he has going on with his knee is something that is degenerative and there's little chance he'll be able to play more than 5 or so years on it before he won't be able to play anymore. So basically it was teams knowing if they draft him, he's probably going to be only a rookie contract player and even if he's great, you might not be able to get use out of him on a second contract.  Which in turn makes the drop make sense, but I'm kinda surprised some contending team didn't take him late in the 1st, hoping he'd put them over the top on a SB run but then not even have to worry about giving him a big contract in 4 years too.
    • Depends if they see the writing on the wall with their roster and contracts and decide to bite the bullet and begin a complete rebuild and roster overhaul.  I have no clue why some franchises (IE us) refuse to do this and keep half assing trying to win 8 games or so.  Do it correctly, take your lumps and build a contender.  We shall see what loomis decides.
    • Each team plays 17 games.  I do not see why they don't just have each team play one international game per year.  Neutral site game, 8 home, 8 away.    
×
×
  • Create New...