Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

lavonte david...


Donald LaFell

Recommended Posts

I also like the guy

He reminds me of that weak side type who really does excel in pass coverage and blitzing...good instincts and quick. He may not be a fit but I think he has a nice future ahead.

I'll admit he's under-sized but he's almost a hybrid Safety/Linebacker...a TD-lite

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I like this guy as well.

It all depends on what CBs are there in the 2nd. If the FO doesn't think that the CBs available aren't good enough, I think they'll take a LB or DE. This is assuming of course they go DT in the 1st.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe I'm wrong to feel this way but I feel like a pash rusher can have some sort of impact immediately. Corners take a little more time. Think back to that Arizona game were Steve torched Patrick Peterson all night. I would be very pleased with a LB with pash rush ability to share duties with Thomas Davis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rather draft a LB that is versatile and can play multiple positions considering the uncertainties we have. Nothing against David though.

I agree. Mychal Kendricks is perfect--listed as an ILB. A bit short, but a thurmper with speed. second rounder/

I also like Demario Davis--could be there in the 4th

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We’re in a pickle. My best hope is we protect him and can run the ball vs most Ds and the WRs are healthy so he has every chance to not look like what he looked like in too many games last year.   
    • I'm really not stressing about upgrading from Bryce. I'm frustrated with our inability (or refusal) to recognize overall bad QB performance and failure to seriously address the issue. QB is the most impactful position on the field, and we're not only settling for what we've been given to this point, but we've rewarded it with a fully guaranteed 5th year extension for a player that's never played 2 NFL franchise QB quality games back to back in 3 seasons. I can't understand how that's ok from a coach's or GM's viewpoint. Successful franchises don't do things like this. It just doesn't make sense.  We do not have a top half of the league QB right now. Since we don't have that player, we should be looking for him. Pickett isn't it. Grier isn't it. Bryce hasn't proven he is yet. Until you have that sure fire franchise QB, you keep looking. You're not consistently making the playoffs, a deep run, or a SB appearance without one.  What's the worst that could happen? We end up with 2 potential number 1 QBs? How horrible. 
    • Easy to understand Pickett, if this is anywhere close to on point. Canales wants to get as close to Bryce as he can- get the pace and timing in the throws as close a he can to Bryce. So the other players don’t have to adjust so much, to a new guy.       If Cam was the 1, he would look for a rocket arm.  But Bryce is the 1. Look for limited in the same way.  Low velocity, plenty of air under it, feels just like home when Picket comes in. And you have the guys on the second team not having such a radical adjustment (if they have to play) like with Dalton to Bryce.    Enter Grier. I guess we will collect those types.   
×
×
  • Create New...