Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Wouldn't it be wild if Fox becomes the next Coughlin?


thefuzz

Recommended Posts

Was thinking earlier today about Coughlin in Jacksonville, and how similar his stint there was to Foxy's here in Carolina.

Think about it.

1. Conservative D minded guys.

2. Widely respected around the league.

3. Emphasis on running game and D line play.

4. Both bumped out of their first HC jobs after being very inconsistant.

Honestly you could go on and on.

Now the only reason I think that Foxy could do as well as Coughlin, and possibly be more consistant year in and year out is the GM there, and the Division. Elway knows the importance of having an unquestioned starter at the QB position, and Foxy obviously knows about the D.

Food for thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

elway wants another QB.

he wants a big athletic QB who can stay in the pocket.

fox just wants a big QB that can stay in the pocket.

coughlin knows how to let the gates open upon offense. fox apologizes for it.

coughlin >>>>> fox and so it shall ever be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tom Coughlin understands the value of an elite QB.

Did you mean to say Reese?

I have always blamed Hurney, and to a lesser extent Fox for their inability to coach up, draft, or acquire a top tier QB.

In Denver, with a HOF QB running the show, I don't think it will be an option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hate these posts. You damn well know what Fox has to do with Carolina.

i hate living in the past.

the discussion has more to do with a guy that is coaching in denver than him being an underachiever here.

it's time to move on.

once a player or coach has gone on from the panthers they essentially become irrelevant unless we are playing against them.

fox isn't a panther anymore. he's a bronco.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...