Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Abortion, ban it or endorse it?????

Iceberg Slim

By Iceberg Slim,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

Iceberg Slim Newbie

Iceberg Slim

Posted
Posted

Seems like everyone has a position on abortion these days. Some folks say its a womans right to control her body, other folks say killing a child is not anyone's right. I'd like to know what the huddle thinks...I'll kick it off, I am anti-abortion, I do in fact believe abortion is killing a child and that further folks have lately used abortion as a means for birth control......your turn

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hawk Newbie

Hawk

Posted
Posted

I agree that it's a woman's right, there's no way we could make exceptions for all of the scenarios out there.

that said, I sure wish more women would reconsider and at least think of all those couples out there trying desperately to have children of their own that can't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
davos Grand Master

davos

Posted
Posted

This is a very difficult issue for me. I'm totally against it but understand the woman's rights side of the argument when it comes to rape or incest. There's no real way to figure out a time period of viability and that's the trickiest part of it all. In the end, I just think you're taking away a life; end of story.

(This may end up in the tbox)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PanthaSan Newbie

PanthaSan

Posted
Posted

I think men should stay out of this one.

I agree, there are childless couples that would love a baby and they should be given that opportunity. We also have to consider the baby-mama's perspective. For whatever reason, she is deciding that she cannot carry the baby and that's her decision alone to make.

In the case of rape...her decision alone.

In the distant past, I have escorted a few women through the protest lines to the clinic. No, not any of mine as I don't agree with abortion (as most of you know, lol) but I do beleive in a woman's right providing it is legal.

I even got in a physical fight with a few protesters and it made the news. 3 on 1 and I came out victorious. One of the A-holes even threatened to sue me for damages to his face.

I don't think the public should fund it but there are programs that will.

Either way, men ain't got a dog in that fight and should stay out of the whole legal/not legal thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

I agree that it's a woman's right, there's no way we could make exceptions for all of the scenarios out there.

that said, I sure wish more women would reconsider and at least think of all those couples out there trying desperately to have children of their own that can't.

rape and if I woman has a higher percentage to die isn't a lot of exceptions. They should have the right to have an abortion.

all the other random chicks who made "poor decisions" have already made their choice when they CHOOSE to spread there legs.

No reason for men to stay out of this issue. We all are created the same way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Panthro Community Regular

Panthro

Posted
Posted

me...If you want an abortion you should have it in the 1st trimester.

I am pro life but I my opinion should no way dictate a woman's decision. I knew that if I had ever found myself in that situation I would give my opinion but also my support for their decision either way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

men should absolutely stay out of the issue.

Why?

Women don't create life on their own. Plus, like I said I believe a women has a right to choose...... and when you choose to engage in sex you excerise that right. The main function of sex is reproduction. If you choose to engage in a reproductive act for other benefits than you have made your choice already.

If you don't want it......give it up. 9-10 months of a women hating being pregnant is better than killing/ending a life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Proudiddy
      We joke about how the NFL has a script for the season. But maybe it's not a joke?

      By Proudiddy · Posted

      I had started typing my post hours ago and didn’t finish it and just came back to finish it, posted it, then saw yours and saw we were pretty much saying the same thing - even the games that stick out to us most.  I don’t think a lot of people remember that SF playoff game, but I felt like I had just got mugged in broad daylight.  I remember them calling Mitchell for unnecessary roughness, and then I remember watching Boldin take a super late cheap shot, dead in front of the ref and then showing him watching the whole thing in replay…  the refs let them have a fuging field day and didn’t do jack poo, but if we so much as breathed the wrong way it was fuging 15 yards.  Each team playing under two completely different sets of rules.  poo hurt.  I was enraged.  I’ve never went back to watch either that game or SB50 and never will.  fuging robbery.
    • Proudiddy
      We joke about how the NFL has a script for the season. But maybe it's not a joke?

      By Proudiddy · Posted

      I’ve said it a million times since, but it’s impossible to keep them from affecting the game.  In SB50, they literally took the game from us, and they did it early.  Cotchery’s no-catch?  The miraculous amount of times we converted for a first down only to have it suddenly called back make it a 3rd down and 15+ against the best defense in the league that specialized in rushing the passer and man coverage on the back end?  And you do that enough times, you kill the morale and confidence of the team you’re doing it against.  It’s telling the one team “you can do whatever with impunity” and the other “you can’t do whatever they’re allowed to do.”  It changes the aggression level.  It essentially neuters one team and allows the other to do whatever the fug they want.  Imagine you call the police for help and they get there and tell you to sit still while the other party beats the poo out of you and you can’t defend yourself.  That’s what the officials do.  There is no way to avoid them affecting the game.  And more often than not, it’s the most subjective calls they use to do so.  Even in SB50…  you saw the Broncos commit more egregious penalties than anything we did, and barely any of it was called.  Their OL was holding all fuging game and the refs did nothing.  We already had our work cut out for us against two future HOF edge rushers and the refs played to their advantage with that.  From what I remember, both Oher and Remmers were called for holding at various times and their hands were in the INSIDE of the defender.  It was garbage, but all by design. Also, if there is any video of it anywhere, go look at what the refs did against us back in 2013 against SF.  The fix was in there too.  They stepped in early and often and ensured we knew we were not allowed to play with the same aggression or intensity SF was.  It was disgusting as well. at this point, I hope Vince McMahon, errr, I mean Goodell just finally scripts us to win it, because this poo is not won via competition or off merit.
    • DaveThePanther2008
      We joke about how the NFL has a script for the season. But maybe it's not a joke?

      By DaveThePanther2008 · Posted

      You can go back to the New York Knicks somehow getting Patrick Ewing.  I saw a story where they place the New York Knick card in the freezer right before the drawing.  It was simple.  Show everyone the cards are undetectable to the human eye.  All they had to do was grab the coldest card. IMO ever since Goodell took over the NFL it has been fishy.  Patriots winning the SB after 9/11, New Orleans after Katrina and Peyton Manning's going away gift against us. The terrible calls during that game were blatantly one sided.  New England should have been stripped of their first 3 SB when they were caught spying on the other team in their SB wins.  I think the evidence against the Patriots was so damning Goodell felt it could ruin football and they brushed it under the table.   In the 2004 SB, How did we go from practically no yards in the first Quarter to setting a record in the 3rd Qtr.  Dan Henning changes the game plan.  IMO probably the greatest half time adjustment of all time.  
×
×
  • Create New...