Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Can someone post Kiper's 2.0 mock?


Actionman0z

Recommended Posts

Carolina PanthersRecord: 6-10

* Michael Brockers, DT, LSU

The Carolina defense in 2011 wasn't helped by injuries, but the result was a unit that couldn't stop the run, but also had a tough time generating consistent pressure on opposing quarterbacks. It starts up front, where the Panthers simply need to add talent. Brockers is a high-ceiling defensive tackle, a player who will thrive in any scheme, but could be particularly effective as a penetrator in the 4-3. The Panthers had to make do rotating a pair of rookies on the defensive interior last season, and really need to add talent and depth. The offense is going to be there -- they have to find some stoppers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mel Kiper's Mock Draft 2.0

1. Indianapolis Colts - Andrew Luck, QB, Stanford

2. St. Louis Rams - Justin Blackmon, WR, Oklahoma State

3. Minnesota Vikings - Matt Kalil, OT, USC

4. Cleveland Browns - Robert Griffin III, QB, Baylor

5. Tampa Bay Buccaneers - Trent Richardson, RB, Alabama

6. Washington Redskins - Morris Claiborne, CB, LSU

7. Jacksonville Jaguars - Quinton Coples, DE, North Carolina

8. Carolina Panthers - Michael Brockers, DT, LSU

9. Miami Dolphins - Riley Reiff, OT, Iowa

10. Buffalo Bills - Courtney Upshaw, LB, Alabama

11. Kansas City Chiefs - Luke Kuechly, LB, Boston College

12. Seattle Seahawks - Melvin Ingram, DE, South Carolina

13. Arizona Cardinals - Jonathan Martin, OT, Stanford

14. Dallas Cowboys - Mark Barron, S, Alabama

15. Philadelphia Eagles - Fletcher Cox, DT, Mississippi State

16. New York Jets - Cordy Glenn, G, Georgia

17. Cincinnati Bengals (from Oakland) - Dre Kirkpatrick, CB, Alabama

18. San Diego Chargers - Michael Floyd, WR, Notre Dame

19. Chicago Bears - Mike Adams, OT, Ohio State

20. Tennessee Titans - Whitney Mercilus, DE, Illinois

21. Cincinnati Bengals - David DeCastro, G, Stanford

22. Cleveland Browns (from Atlanta) - Kendall Wright, WR, Baylor

23. Detroit Lions - Janoris Jenkins, CB, North Alabama

24. Pittsburgh Steelers - Dontari Poe, DT, Memphis

25. Denver Broncos - Devon Still, DT, Penn State

26. Houston Texans - Jerel Worthy, DT, Michigan State

27. New England Patriots (from Saints) - Vinny Curry, OLB, Marshall

28. Green Bay Packers - Harrison Smith, S, Notre Dame

29. Baltimore Ravens - Peter Konz, C, Wisconsin

30. San Francisco 49ers - Rueben Randle, WR, LSU

31. New England Patriots - Kendall Reyes, DT, Connecticut

32. New York Giants - Dwayne Allen, TE, Clemson

http://forum.walterfootball.com/showthread.php?25693-Mel-Kiper-s-Mock-Draft-2-0

..
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Carolina PanthersRecord: 6-10

* Michael Brockers, DT, LSU

The Carolina defense in 2011 wasn't helped by injuries, but the result was a unit that couldn't stop the run, but also had a tough time generating consistent pressure on opposing quarterbacks. It starts up front, where the Panthers simply need to add talent. Brockers is a high-ceiling defensive tackle, a player who will thrive in any scheme, but could be particularly effective as a penetrator in the 4-3. The Panthers had to make do rotating a pair of rookies on the defensive interior last season, and really need to add talent and depth. The offense is going to be there -- they have to find some stoppers.

I don't have an issue with this pick prediction. However, his comment about rotating a pair of rookies makes no sense.

The Panthers had to make do rotating a pair of rookis on the defensive interior last season....and the solution is to add ANOTHER rookie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't have an issue with this pick prediction. However, his comment about rotating a pair of rookies makes no sense.

The Panthers had to make do rotating a pair of rookis on the defensive interior last season....and the solution is to add ANOTHER rookie.

this is important because they will stay rookies forever.

:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't have an issue with this pick prediction. However, his comment about rotating a pair of rookies makes no sense.

The Panthers had to make do rotating a pair of rookis on the defensive interior last season....and the solution is to add ANOTHER rookie.

I think this was just his way of saying that our DT situation sucks, so we need more help. Don't need to read things so literally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is one of my key concerns lost in the sauce that is the neverending conversation about him evading pressure and the OL. Eventually any QB is going to have to step up into the pocket and show the defense they can still beat them even if they get through. We have a limited QB who cannot consistently do this and as such we are relegated to going back and forth about how successful he was at evading pressure but we have little else to write home about. Tyler Shough stepped up into the pocket and made plays despite being pressured and sacked. He's played in about 35 less games than Bryce Young. That is a problem. And isn't just going to go away. The Bucs are going to do the same thing after watching the film.
    • Oh, absolutely! That doesn't absolve the absolute dogshit hockey that the team played in front of him, though. Only Cane that played well tonight was Bradly Nadeau.
    • Thanks for illustrating my point.  No one in the last several pages of this discussion is suggesting we should hang on to him, but anytime someone says anything less than "take him out back and shoot him" you act like they are. That's either you not understanding what you're reading or just being a nimrod because you can't keep up. (I would have said 'or just sh-tposting' but you're way too emotional on this topic for that) Either way, the result is the same 😆
×
×
  • Create New...