Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trade up to #4?

NJPanthers89

By NJPanthers89,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

NJPanthers89 Enthusiast

NJPanthers89

Posted
Posted

Here's a scenario that could be of great interest. If Miami misses out on Peyton, they will go hard after Flynn and likely get him. this will leave Cleveland in dire straights as far as having a competent starting QB. They will be looking hard at Tannehill but they know #4 is too early for him. But our pick #9 is actually the perfect spot to grab Tannehill and gain a few picks just a few spots in front of Seattle and KC.

I personally would be willing to trade our 1st next year for the 6 slot swap in order to get Claiborne or Blackmon this year. It might only require our 2nd rounder this year ( based on the fact that a 1st rounder for next year is considered the same value as a current second rounder ).

Just wanted some opinions on this trade that IMHO has some serious potential especially with Hurney..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
NJPanthers89 Enthusiast

NJPanthers89

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Why are we willing to trade back to receive second and third rounders we are notoriously known for missing big on? Why don't we trade up in the first and get the stud we want in Claiborne? We will have a potentially lockdown corner locked up for cheap for years to come. Look at the receivers in our division, they are better than the RB's at this point. We need a CB more than a DT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Panthro Community Regular

Panthro

Posted
Posted

Why are we willing to trade back to receive second and third rounders we are notoriously known for missing big on? Why don't we trade up in the first and get the stud we want in Claiborne? We will have a potentially lockdown corner locked up for cheap for years to come. Look at the receivers in our division, they are better than the RB's at this point. We need a CB more than a DT.

We have more needs than just another CB though. What about Jenkins at #22 or Gillmore?

Claiborne is not a guarantee either. Patrick Peterson was pretty abysmal when it came to coverage last year....just saying

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Navy_football
      Why does Bryce get the blame?

      By Navy_football · Posted

      Roger all that. Do you think BY avoided any sacks last game? This oline is not what you're touting them to be. They are much better then 2023! Much much much better than 2023. But come on now, you'd expect this expensive oline (most are run blocking specialist) to at least dominate in the run game every game.  And... I keep telling you our WRs and TEs are not that good yet. I mean last Sunday was a prime example. Our receiving targets never make plays like those. Never. And this is from one of the worst teams in the league. Shough could have easily had 3 INTs if not for his receivers making plays on the ball. Our guys just don't do that. XL almost allowed an INT backing up out of bounds instead of coming to the ball. And everyone would have blamed that on BY. That's why he doesn't throw to that dude. I can't recall a game except maybe the second Falcons game - maybe, where I thought our receivers could possibly be better than the other team's. I think TMac and Coker have a lot of potential. But they're aren't consistent. But they're young and WILL improve. I'm confident of that.  I don't agree that BY was drafted to only stand in the pocket. He has always been best off schedule - for better or worse. 
    • ForJimmy
      Why does Bryce get the blame?

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      Do you think you will get a direct answer?  Icky giving up 5 pressures (playing hurt in his defense) by himself and Bryce only getting sacked once tells you he played well in the pocket.  He extended plays and converted some tough downs.  
    • frankw
      What gets this team past this?

      By frankw · Posted

      I've been very apprehensive about potentially firing yet another head coach. But Canales needs to focus on being a head coach first and foremost and begin handing off some responsibilities like playcalling duties and begin overseeing the entire team or we need to assess all possible ideal HC candidates in the offseason.
×
×
  • Create New...