Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I Just Watched 6 Games Worth Of Quinton Coples Snaps...


Catalyst

Recommended Posts

nothing makes him right or wrong until coples goes to the NFL and we see how he does. it does make it more useful as far as discussion than people basing their opinions off of being a unc homer or copy and pasting what they read off some draft website

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cox is a defensive tackle, there's difference.

Again you miss the point. It was simply that in 9 of 13 games he had no sacks. But no one is holding that against him so it is ridiculous to hold the fact that Coples got some of his sacks against lesser competition. Cox got no sacks against UAB or Louisiana Tech or Tennesee Martinsville. Is that a problem??? No........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What? You base your opinion off of non-biased footage that happens to be made available on Youtube?

Well fug you man. I watched a few plays on a Youtube vid called "CoPles is da best!!!" and saw him dominate in a meaningless all-star game, plus some scouts who base their opinion on height/weight/athletic ability said he should be picked early. You know, they're never wrong and don't base any opinions based off of anything other than production. Same reason why Dontari Poe is gonna be a top 20 pick cuz he DOMINATED college ball. So you can shut up and listen to me and some BleacherReport mock drafts and realize that Coples is the best!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again you miss the point. It was simply that in 9 of 13 games he had no sacks. But no one is holding that against him so it is ridiculous to hold the fact that Coples got some of his sacks against lesser competition. Cox got no sacks against UAB or Louisiana Tech or Tennesee Martinsville. Is that a problem??? No........

I will preface this with saying I'm not a big fan of Fletcher Cox either.....but right or wrong sacks are the primary measurement of a DE, not a DT.

No it's not a problem when sacks are not a primary measurement of how good a DT is. It's similar to comparing LB's and DB in terms of interceptions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will preface this with saying I'm not a big fan of Fletcher Cox either.....but right or wrong sacks are the primary measurement of a DE, not a DT.

No it's not a problem when sacks are not a primary measurement of how good a DT is. It's similar to comparing LB's and DB in terms of interceptions.

But you still haven't addressed the point at all. It wasn't about whether Cox or Coples got more sacks or that sacks were the primary issue which is what you suggest. It was that you can't compare sacks or any stat based on the opponent without considering other facts like player matchups, schemes etc. And that there were games against lesser competition where neither did well. I used sacks because that was what the poster used on Coples.

I appreciate your point and agree that sacks for DTs aren't the primary issue but it is largely extraneous to this discussion. On the other hand if the discussion had been which player would make more of an impact in Rivera's desire to generate a pass rush, it might be germaine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hard to get sacks when in every game, in every game situation, you are the absolute, no brainer, beyond any shadow of doubt, primary focus of the blocking scheme.

watch the games again... you tube, cathode ray tube, tube top, or viewmaster... it matters not. when you occupy more than one guy, you win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that if Robert Quinn can be drafted at 14 last year by St. Louis we would not hesitate to select Coples at 9 this year as he has much better measurables and a higher upside. I think they take him if they are targeting DE early in this draft. DT and CB are probably a little deeper in this draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quinn thus far looks like he was overdrafted, he hasn't done well at all in the NFL. I believe the Rams had him 4th or 5th on their DE depth chart at one point and they're not exactly overflowing with talent.

I agree with you. But it is that same mindset that gets these guys drafted so high, its the hype. Unfortunately he will be taken in the top 15. I personally hope Cox falls to us and we move on to getting a CB in round 2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • with arm strength people often get stuck on the distance  arm strength in the NFL is moreso measured in speed / velocity .which of course is how long does it take for  the ball to travel from the time of release until it reaches its target ? & u beat world class speed with more speed on the ball...just saying  
    • No GM hits 100%. I'm well aware. But what a GM has to do is look at the roster, what's available, and future contracts and go from there. XL was a one season wonder in college. He has speed. Who cares. He body catches and his hands are bricks. Speed doesn't matter when you don't actually have the ball. There were other receivers available with better resumes. XL was a project. Fitts loved projects. You don't have the luxury of projects when you just traded away DJ for a QB. 1st round WRs need to contribute now.  Brooks was a luxury RB pick we didn't have the luxury to make. Who cares if Dallas was going to pick him. We had holes all over our defense. Chuba was coming off a fresh contract. We just inked 150m interior line and then centered it by moving a guard to center that had suffered 2 season ending injuries. The most critical area on our line was being held together by a bandaid and a prayer. No surprise when it didn't work.   Wallace is getting better but Wilson was sitting there waiting to be taken. DPOY for college football right there for the taking. That was a gimme pick. If you're going to take a risk on an injured player, the 3rd round for Wilson made a whole lot more sense at a position we were rest stop TP thin at.  4th round and on aren't going to be heavy contributors unless you're lucky.  He did well on the trade for Jackson. Coker, I believe he offered the largest guarantee. He actually got more than some late round picks make.  Those 1st 3 picks, IMO, were straight up whiffs.  Looking back at Fitterer's picks, I think he tried to plug holes because we had a ton of them. Problem was, he wasn't very good at it and he loved RAS scores and developmental players with a coach that couldn't develop a Polaroid. He tried to do too much. He was impatient. His other problem was he panicked during the draft and couldn't read or understand the flow of how drafts tend to go. DJ Johnson was the prime example. We needed an edge rusher and he jumped in at the end of the run instead of starting it.  Morgan's first year looked exactly like Fitts to me. Lots of projects.  2nd year looks better.  We'll see how 3rd year goes. FA also plays into all of this as well but that's a whole different topic of how it played out and planning with regard to drafting. 
    • I judge how good our players are by the way a defense covers them. XL draws no special coverage. Coker on the other hand always has a man over the top. It still doesn’t matter. You be the judge.
×
×
  • Create New...