Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2Nd Round Gm Pick


Lout

Players Available  

50 members have voted

  1. 1. Who do you take in the 2nd round?

    • Nick Perry - DE - USC
    • Vinny Curry - DE - Marshall
    • Jayron Hosley - CB - Virginia Tech
    • Josh Robinson - CB - UCF
    • Kendall Wright - WR - Baylor
    • Reuben Randle - WR - LSU
      0
    • Zach Brown - LB - UNC
    • Lavonte David - LB - Nebraska
    • Markelle Martin - S - Oklahoma St
      0
    • Trumaine Johnson - S - Montana


Recommended Posts

Assuming that the following players are available at our pick in the 2nd round. For the sake of this exercise, lets assume that we took Fletcher Cox with our #9 Overall (most mock drafts have us taking him). Any players you don't see, they were most likely taken ahead of us.

I included the top 2 players at each position of need that I believe will be available when we pick in the 2nd round.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I chose Trumaine Johnson, even though you listed him at S, I see him as a big CB, much along the lines of Dre Kirkpatrick. He's physical, he's tough, he's also got some serious swag. One thing Trumaine Johnson loves to do is hit people. He seeks out the RB at the line of scrimmage, he'll deliver some hard knocks to a receiver. He's not a guy that's going to shy away from it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok good. I heard Trumaine is a freak talent with off field issues. I wanted to see if there would be any kind of huddle consensus on this. Seems like the 1st round pick gets all the attention. Seems like it might be all over the place though. I would be happy if we took almost any of these guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Assuming we didnt take Coples in the first we gotta take 1 of the following

Perry - insanely quick and agile. could use more technique. at 33' his arms could be longer

Curry - explosive pass rusher. nice array of moves. very long arms at 35'. non stop motor.

Jones - nice prospect with the most upside

David - very nice talent in the 2nd

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perry to me seems more like an OLB in 34. Kendall Wright will probably go in top 20 picks, so he represents the best value

Nick Perry said he wants to play DE in the NFL, not OLB.. so I think a lot of 3-4 teams are taking him off their board. I think that's pretty closed minded of him.

Perry and Curry are both 6'3" 265-270lbs.. I'd be very happy with either one. I like Curry's motor more. But I think between the two, we'd probably take Perry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perry and Curry are both 6'3" 265-270lbs.. I'd be very happy with either one. I like Curry's motor more. But I think between the two, we'd probably take Perry.

Perry and Curry are pretty similar in stature.

Curry has a better motor, better technique and longer arms 35' compared to 33'

Perry is quicker and more athletic

Cant go wrong with either imo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wright is the best player. Dude will be a pro-bowler. I picked him, but I don't think he will be there. Also don't think Perry will be there, but he would be my second choice.

The two I do think will be there are Curry and David. If we go Cox in the first I take David. If we go anything other than DL in the first I take Curry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • “Y’all been watching film, huh? That’s cool, watch this.”
    • Really? Wow. Sorry. Got my timeline messed up. I remember someone claiming to be Graham’s mom on the old Charlotte.com board so I guess it was a long time ago that he was here. I guess I thought he was after Kasay. 
    • Nick Scott has gotten his share of Huddle hate, but I came across this SI article by Zach Roberts when I was researching recently released Quandre Diggs, speculated to be a better option  (https://lastwordonsports.com/nfl/2025/11/07/breaking-titans-cut-former-three-time-pro-bowler-quandre-diggs-4-destinations-ranked/3/), but getting back to Nick Scott... Now to be fair, the observation on Scott was before the Packers game, but the stats couldn't have changed that much, and may have gotten better.   "At some point during virtually every Carolina Panthers game, you have probably found yourself grumbling about Nick Scott. The much-maligned safety has seemingly been out of position a lot or has failed to make a play. The eye test has often let him down. "But that's why stats are so helpful. Sometimes, the eye test, especially for fans, is unreliable. On occasion, advanced metrics help make sense of things and lend more clarity. In the case of Scott, they make him look like a much better safety than any of us would've guessed. "In coverage, Scott has given up just 15 yards and an average of five yards per catch. That's the lowest among safeties, leading superstars like Julian Love, Talanoa Hafunga, Quandre Diggs, Kerby Joseph, Kyle Hamilton, and Minkah Fitzpatrick. "In FI%, the safety leads all his counterparts once again at 40%. Brian Branch, Camren Kinchens, and Xavier McKinney are some notable names he leads. He's been pretty excellent in pass coverage, which is crucial for the Panthers." For those wondering, "FI" means forced incompletions. Now I'm way past trying to figure out why X links aren't embedding for me like they used to, but here you go: https://x.com/dacornerman/status/1981363757608513632?t=rx_5iLjp8_y5huNcg_y1nA&s=19   Suffice it to say that Scott may not be as bad as some have led on.    https://www.si.com/nfl/panthers/onsi/news/much-maligned-panthers-db-way-better-than-think      
×
×
  • Create New...