Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Attention Whiners ....


Zod

Recommended Posts

I don't care about having all-pro LBs if my DL is right on par with the worst in the league.

How good do you expect our now three first round linebackers to be with a garbage DL.

We've never seen this DL play together. DT's usually have a big jump from rookie to second year also. With Edwards at the nose and Mcclain starting next to him, with all our other young players rotating in, I see our line being greatly improved. Plus we can still get a nice DT in this draft. DLine is incredibly deep this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The team that did select Hightower and also needed major defensive help selected a pass rusher first.

The Pats, as usual, had their poo together.

We are not the Patriots, we did not have the same needs as the Patriots, and Patriot-envy is all fine and well but it has no bearing on the quality of the Kuechly pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The team that did select Hightower and also needed major defensive help selected a pass rusher first.

The Pats, as usual, had their poo together.

The Pats are possibly the worst drafting team in the league, unless you consider stock piling picks a good draft. When they actually pick players they are absolutely awful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<<--- big fan of those who see the positive to this... considering Rivera seems to have a clue about what he wants to build his team around, I fail to see why Cox, Poe, and Brockers are such a failure... McClain shown flashes, as well as Fua... I guess we'll get to see why they suck so bad for us to bash Chico...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are not the Patriots, we did not have the same needs as the Patriots, and Patriot-envy is all fine and well but it has no bearing on the quality of the Kuechly pick.

I (and the rest of the league) are well aware the Panthers are not the Patriots.

They needed help generating a rush and filling out their LB group. They also have up and down CB play. Sound familiar? I was just pointing out the way the well-run organizations tend to approach building on Defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We've never seen this DL play together. DT's usually have a big jump from rookie to second year also. With Edwards at the nose and Mcclain starting next to him, with all our other young players rotating in, I see our line being greatly improved. Plus we can still get a nice DT in this draft. DLine is incredibly deep this year.

How good do you realistically expect our DL to be? Surely you don't look at our two garbage young DT's and think "aw, gee, yeah, they're just young. They'll be elite. For sure."

If we're lucky, they will be serviceable. And that seems to be okay with Hurney as long as he has an elite LB corp.

This team hasn't had a strong DL since like 2006. It's absurd. It's the year 2012, rushing the passer is right behind your own offensive passing attack in terms of building a successful team.

Sure. We could go DL in round 2 tommorow. Or we could have taken a better prospect there today and gotten a nice late-first round Secondary talen there tommorow.

Hurney's priorities are screwed up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a big fan the last 2 years, can't wait until tomorrow night to confirm what seems to be on the horizon.... Should that horizon be a falure, we see the end of the beginning and can move on... however, thus far, I see positives.. Especially after viewing Fox's tenure, however maybe that isn't such a great thing..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How good do you realistically expect our DL to be? Surely you don't look at our two garbage young DT's and think "aw, gee, yeah, they're just young. They'll be elite. For sure."

If we're lucky, they will be serviceable. And that seems to be okay with Hurney as long as he has an elite LB corp.

This team hasn't had a strong DL since like 2006. It's absurd. It's the year 2012, rushing the passer is right behind your own offensive passing attack in terms of building a successful team.

Sure. We could go DL in round 2 tommorow. Or we could have taken a better prospect there today and gotten a nice late-first round Secondary talen there tommorow.

Hurney's priorities are screwed up.

Rivera's defense requires a strong LB corps and nothing more than an average and non-poo Dline. As long as they are better than last year our defense will be vastly improved. You're basing your knowledge of how defenses work on a very simplistic and biased view.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We've never seen this DL play together. DT's usually have a big jump from rookie to second year also. With Edwards at the nose and Mcclain starting next to him, with all our other young players rotating in, I see our line being greatly improved. Plus we can still get a nice DT in this draft. DLine is incredibly deep this year.

What?

Fua, McClain,Shirley, Nebleet, and Krease are to DT what Clausen was to QB. Give him another year, everyone sucked around him and they won't actually suck this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fua, McClain,Shirley, Nebleet, and Krease are to DT what Clausen was to QB. Give him another year, everyone sucked around him and they won't actually suck this year.

Are you functionally retarded or what? You've repeated this three times now and it means the same amount of jackshit as it did the first two times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I (and the rest of the league) are well aware the Panthers are not the Patriots.

They needed help generating a rush and filling out their LB group. They also have up and down CB play. Sound familiar? I was just pointing out the way the well-run organizations tend to approach building on Defense.

If they were drafting top ten, they might take a different approach if they couldn't find a trade partner. They were in a vastly different situation. You are vastly oversimplying things. I do not think they went into the Jones pick and said, "Okay, well, Hightower may be better, but hell we need a good versatile end, so lets get Jones and pick up someone for the interior later."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How good do you realistically expect our DL to be? Surely you don't look at our two garbage young DT's and think "aw, gee, yeah, they're just young. They'll be elite. For sure."

If we're lucky, they will be serviceable. And that seems to be okay with Hurney as long as he has an elite LB corp.

This team hasn't had a strong DL since like 2006. It's absurd. It's the year 2012, rushing the passer is right behind your own offensive passing attack in terms of building a successful team.

Sure. We could go DL in round 2 tommorow. Or we could have taken a better prospect there today and gotten a nice late-first round Secondary talen there tommorow.

Hurney's priorities are screwed up.

I only quote this to prove that someone does in fact find our 3rd round DTs to be "garbage".... granted they were 1st year 3rd round picks... someone was asking how ludicrous that might be that they expect them to be impressive, so here it is..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
    • Classic example on what AI is not currently good for.  It will create a baseline of statistics (which are fine but must be used alongside tape and other evals) and partner that with every rumor mongering dips*&$t on the web.  
×
×
  • Create New...